The two words Claude said to Germain at the end of the film impressed me. On a toujours le moyen d'entrer dans n'importe quelle maison. Et vous pourriez m'aider, non? People always have a way to enter other people’s lives, you Will it help me? And the action of M. Germain who followed: did not speak, looked at Claude from time to time, with a sad, helpless and truly content smile. One of the details here is that when he looks at Claude, the corners of his mouth are raised, and when he looks away from C and lowers his head to look at himself or look at the lights of thousands of houses facing the houses, he Still smiling, but this is a very slight smile, the corners of the mouth are raised very subtle, and it is no different from not smiling, but it clearly gives the audience a feeling-he is still smiling. It was Claude who left him with nothing, but why would people feel so happy to be with someone who left him with nothing? There is only one answer, and that is, he has brought you more than you have lost. So you think from the bottom of your heart that this is a worthwhile business for you, and you are willing to continue a dangerous game. Perhaps in the eyes of others, this is just an old man with no job, no children, and a vacant house, and his beard is not shaved clean. However, Claude understands his inner expectations and illusions about literature. No one understands better than Claude. Even M. Germain didn't know himself, and Claude awakened the longing that had been sleeping in his mind for decades, and revealed to him an unprecedented way of revealing reality. It is straightforward, but full of danger. Claude and Germain are aware of the danger, but they want to play, and everything can't be reversed from the moment G helps C steal the math test paper. Because of the danger, so I enjoy it. I think this is the nature of a part of everyone, willing to take risks and even self-destruct for the sake of the unknown. He does not hesitate to use the collapse of material life and social relations to exchange for a new personal spirit. I feel a kind of tragic freedom that cannot be recognized and understood by the world. What it cares about is not the hindrances of "the school is heavy and there is no time to travel" or "the family is not rich and reluctant to take a loan to study abroad" or the like. It has been extended to more far-reaching absolute freedom, that is, to break through all institutional frameworks, and to make words and actions that meet the inner desires without considering the constraints of morals and laws. Its cost is high, and the happiness and satisfaction it brings is very imaginable. In the context of political freedom, this kind of freedom is an extremely beautiful arrogance that will undoubtedly die, but it still commands my respect. ___________________________________________________ Monsieur Germain avait tout perdu, sa femme, son travail. Mais J'etais là à ses côtés. Mr. Gilman has lost everything, his wife, and his job. But I am still by his side. At the end, it’s really good for you, the director, to expose true love so nakedly! Having said that, it seems that this combination can only be reasonable. Raphal, Raphal's mother, Germain's wife, C is very happy with them, hugs left and right. But no one is true love. These people are all props in the composition practice, and more props from Germain's mouth are eager to be more curious. This is a movie of God Unfolding. The biggest advantage of God Unfolding is that the entry point is small but the radioactivity is infinite. A thousand people can have a thousand ways to understand it. In my opinion, what the director wants to expose is the infinite relevance of interpersonal relationships. At the same time, it satirizes the pedantic and stupidity of modern people in handling interpersonal relationships, because people are always strangling people with a mask of willingness to make more people. Really interesting connection with people. People gave up imagination, people gave up sincerity. So I think what dans la maison reflects is not only in the literal sense, C intervenes in R's life. The profoundness of the film lies in the fact that C affects G's family. Although C did not enter G's maison, the emotional deterioration between Germain and his wife has become more and more intense in this dangerous game. At the same time, Raphal and Germain, the two families that had no intersection, under the guidance of Claude, even established a deep resentment. Going back to the previous statement that "people always have a way to enter other people's lives", you can also have a deeper insight. This does not only mean that if a person has a heart, he can enter anyone's life. What is even more wonderful and frightening is that you will never affect more than one person. If you are a drop of water, you must have a ripple. If you have a gust of wind, you will surely set off a wave. If you want to dig out a person, then you may influence a whole network of people, or even a third party that has nothing to do with your exploration, such as Mr. Germain. Dans la maison. The real essence is actually Au dehors de la maison. *Note: The French in the comment is my own dictation based on Chinese subtitles. If there is any inaccuracy in the dictation, please give me advice.
View more about In the House reviews
