The whole Battlestar is too much about morality vs. interests, personal vs. other people’s contradictions. As an ordinary person, it is difficult to understand how metaphysical things that are originally written are analyzed in specific matters. After watching the episodes of the four seasons, the process of forgetting to sleep and eat. The little bit accumulated in the process will imprint oneself, and it may not necessarily bring essential influence on one's future behavior. But I hope that at least when I encounter a similar situation, it can give me subconscious inspiration.
Survival is realistic, and meaning is found by oneself.
At the beginning of her speech to the crew, Kane pointed out the significance of the warship she was thinking about, the value of everyone's life: to fight against Cylon. This is determined by the objective environment and personal will. At the same time, at the beginning of the drama series, the two protagonists: Amada also struggled with the president to compromise before finding the survival meaning of the fleet: searching for the earth.
So, Kane, this is a warrior, a fighter, and a sharp blade.
The meaning of Kane's survival is to fight, to give Cylon the most valuable and efficient blow.
On the contrary, Amada and Kane are often compared. Amada is much slower to find meaning, and at first Amada showed theoretical limitations and selfishness, such as searching with half the fuel of the entire fleet. Ceres. In the end, he found his purpose of survival is to protect the entire fleet, and everyone reaches the earth. Here, the value of life lies in reaching the earth, not in traumatizing the enemy.
In addition, Captain Shaw has been practicing the soldier's code of conduct from the beginning to the end. She resolutely implemented the order. She was condemned by herself. In the end, she insisted on manually launching the nuclear bomb according to the soldier's standard of conduct. In Shaw, in front of her goal, there is no emotion, no morality, what is dedicated to accomplishing the goal and what is not. There are only goals and responsibilities in shaw. In the end, she chose to insist on detonating herself. I understand that she is not self-liberating, but insisting on her principles, insisting on the responsibility of a soldier, and insisting on the principle that a group of soldiers became an army.
Regardless of right or wrong, if the president is wrong, then people will regret killing a lot of Cylons because of their compassion to their people before they finally die. If Kane is wrong, how can you prove that you should have killed a few fewer of yourself? people?
Put it to myself, let alone morality, I can't let go of personal emotions.
View more about Battlestar Galactica: Razor reviews