we do not know.
The war photographer took the risk and left these shots.
I always think that movies are called movies because of their particularity. The thrilling shots express the contrast between a large number of ordinary people and the protagonist.
Maybe the film itself is not very good, and there is suspicion of brainwashing, but the person who made this film has indeed become a film.
I think the perspective of this movie is very subtle. You are a war photographer, what can you do to watch your compatriots die one by one? This choice of one's own role is refined. In the government, the military can tolerate a struggle and trade-off between the "truth" and the truth. As far as the meaning of a movie is concerned, this perspective is very clever to separate the moral level. He doesn’t say many things, and he can’t say many things, but he can emphasize, suggest, show you facial expressions, and let you. Listen to the tone. A certain anti-war sentiment can be seen from these shots. You know that the soldiers are exhausted physically and mentally, and so are the soldiers' families. It is so cruel that people who have spoken well in the first few minutes may pass away at some point in the future. And all this is because of the war. From the life and death of a single life can be linked to our resistance, the price of blood is not casual. From this perspective, I hope everyone can understand why China and Japan "always" do not go to war. War can't really solve anything. I do not support war.
The scene described in this movie is truly in desperation. There is no way out, either life or death.
Looking back at ourselves, the U.S. military was replaced by the Japanese military, and the languages translated by the translator were replaced with Chinese and Japanese. This kind of role change, our country has also experienced wars, and the change in our psychological positioning can make it easier for you to see the true face of war and to examine ourselves more easily.
View more about Restrepo reviews
