Dajian

Luisa 2022-01-14 08:01:35

I don’t know why there are so many people who hate this film. I guess they have watched it as a commercial blockbuster. They think that Hollywood is, besides thrilling, murderous, horrible pornography, it is ambiguous, incest, sensational and anti-terrorist. . . "All the king's man" can be said to be the best film I have seen in recent years. It is simply perfect, no matter from the beauty of the shooting screen or the performance of the actors. Looking at the whole film, I admire Sean’s acting skills. His speech performance is very inflammatory (although looking up at the shooting up close makes us feel too artificial, but the effect achieved at long distances is very different.) How can I be the role of this character Can't like it. I don’t think this is a question of how much he has done for the public, nor is it a question of whether he is spitting in his speech, nor is it simply a question of “power leads to corruption and degeneration”. There is a deeper reason behind these appearances. The reason lies in the hierarchy, and these are closely related to the historical background of American politics at that time. The director wanted to remake this film and realized that this kind of political philosophy has continued to expand indefinitely is an extremely important reason. Precisely because of this, the story itself is rather vague, or even unclear, because some things can only be unspeakable.

In my own understanding, I think the film involves the position of conservatives, which of course emerges from the eyes of the protagonist as the governor of the Democratic Party. Of course, it also talked about the contradictions between the "American Dream" and "elitism", and the potential insurmountable obstacles between different classes of people. Sean’s almost exaggerated speech made me see the "power of gangsters". Maybe this is called "public violence." Democracy and despotism are indeed only separated by a piece of paper.

In addition, the torture of Jude Law's self-spirit progressed through his continuous struggle, and the depth was more powerful. He kept swinging between the governor (the blind ideal of reinventing oneself) and his adoptive father (far away from real life and class background), which led to his self-harm, and this is precisely the illusory and blind side of man. There is a line in the film sometimes we're so full of want that we forget what's we want. Just like Qian Zhong’s "Besieged City" written by Qian Zhong, he keeps regretting what he has done but keeps on doing it, and even produces a vicious circle and can’t treat himself. responsible. It wasn't until his adoptive father committed suicide that he finally became sober, but found that he couldn't stop, and then he began to convert to his fate and stopped fighting. When he knew that his friend had been used and fooled by the governor, he was not angry, because at this time he had already become a walking dead, living numbly in this world and knew that he could not change everything. Maybe he is comforting himself by serving the public. It wasn't until he saw the governor and his friend fall to the ground with his own eyes that he fully understood that this was destiny, and nothing could be changed.

View more about All the King's Men reviews

Extended Reading
  • Reid 2022-03-19 09:01:07

    For Luzhou people, Huey P. Long is an indelible name. Sean Penn's performance is passionate, but the film has more than enough hints for several important supporting roles, lacks in-depth analysis, and has a large amount of narrative information but lacks a sense of visual rhythm. The display of political darkness and character transformation is superficial.

  • Elenora 2022-03-24 09:03:07

    Isn't that what politics is?

All the King's Men quotes

  • [repeated line]

    Willie Stark: Nail 'em up!

  • Jack Burden: You only get a couple of moments that determine your life. Sometimes only one. And then it's gone. Forever.