the last choice of the serious old man, I think it should be the choice of normal judicial personnel. It has nothing to do with his sense of justice and integrity. It just has to be chosen like this, otherwise, what do you do as a lawyer? Otherwise, what do you do as a lawyer? The litigant is guilty of many cases. Isn't it true that none of these cases will be accepted? What about lawyers? starve?
So at the end, I know that he has been suppressing himself, wanting to spit out in court, in this sacred place, and then cheer up and barely support himself to complete this criminal lawsuit.
However, when he told the truth, I was still dumbfounded. Old Ah's acting skills, his passion, burst out like him when he was young. I am still dumbfounded. As a person studying law and determined to be a lawyer, I already had my choice.
But in the end, this lawyer with a sense of justice still violated the lawyer’s code. There was no ethics
in the diary two days ago, with friends In their chats, they all emphasized this sentence:
"The truth is related to a lawsuit, just like a hot dog and a hot dog-it has nothing to do with each other!" A judicial essay
is a lawyer’s rule, protecting the client, not protecting justice.
However, Lao Ah is considered a violation and is not a good lawyer. However, his behavior is a patriotic citizen, a law-abiding citizen, and a genuine respect for the judicial spirit who
reminds me of Zola
ultimately, this may be old a lawyer law license revoked, may have a lot of political persecution since then, but maybe the destitute
at least, he did it with a clear conscience
film left We have a question:
As lawyers, should we respect justice? Or respect the profession?
View more about And Justice for All reviews
