reviews footprint
I understand this movie. If this is a game of wits and courage, it is divided into three rounds. Needless to say, in the first round and the second sentence, the old man and the young man each won a round. But in the third game, which is the last part of the continuous development climax, it is really confusing. The key to everyone's discussion is to see who the exercise is for whom. I think that from the old people’s unwillingness to pour the young people and the extremely reluctant demands on the young people, it can be seen that the old people are planning to humiliate the young people and also let the young people leave their wives. However, young people are also acting, and the final awakening is not accidental. He was testing the old man at the beginning, and then he also said many profound words to stimulate the old man. At this time, none of them deceived anyone, but no one would let go of saying that they were designing, because if they were obviously exposed, it would also mean a loser, and neither of them could confirm whether the other party was really in the middle of the game. Finally, when the old man touched the young man and was rejected by the young man, it can be seen that the young man thought that the old man had been tricked, so he verbally humiliated the old man and mentioned that the old man’s wife wanted to come back for money. But the most important point is that he said that the old man's wife can ask him to drink in the future, which is to tell the old man that you feed your wife and I will take her away. This is something that the elderly cannot tolerate. So the old man shot him to death. This in itself is just an emotional instinct, no one loses or wins. If you really want to separate the winners and losers, then these two people are losers, and the loss of their lives and the loss of their loved ones and freedom (in jail) does not mean that either of them has taken advantage.
View more about Sleuth reviews
