"A fragile organization" is probably the meaning of the question. Mercenaries, regular troops, observation missions, various envoys of this kind, under the name of humanitarian aid, are maintained by such a fragile organization and bound by a charter that exists more as a formal meaning, and appear grandiosely In all kinds of mess, jealousy, arbitrarily mischievous. On the one hand, it is the weakness of the United Nations that frequently throws out implied authorizations. On the other hand, member states wantonly use their veto power to dismiss even nominal condemnations. Throwing bombs can still be ignored. Trafficking in people is considered a bird. The so-called supranational organizations exist only to deal with the old gangsters. Once it comes to their painful feet, no one is willing to transfer judicial power to the International Criminal Court. Old America takes the lead in boycotting the "Rome Statute". What kind of fame can you play? And just like Bolkovac's final choice, stabs the basket, I am afraid it will always be more effective than choosing who to believe.
Obviously, the rhythm of the second half of the film is better, and the technique is not lacking in strength. It is probably because the story itself is powerful enough, and the ending does not provide any salvation, because it does not exist at all.
View more about
The Whistleblower reviews
