First look at Western civilization. The political theory of John Locke, a famous political philosopher during the European Enlightenment period, advocated democratic politics, but He also believes that women should not have the right to vote because they should not be counted as citizens.
For another example, the Christian "Bible" and "The Book of Job" have such BS female words
"How can any man be clean? born of woman, can he ever be good?" (Job 15:14-15)
In addition, in the Middle Ages The so-called "source of Western civilization" in ancient Greece, Aristotle, was also a "great philosopher" who also didn't want to see women and slaves. The
German idealist philosopher Nietzsche said many prejudicial comments on women, For example, in his "The Saying of Zarathustra" he said:
"Women have not yet the ability to establish friendship with other people. They are actually just cats, birds, and cows at best"
(women are not, as yet, capable of friendship; they are still cats, or birds, or at best cows)
"Men should be trained to deal with war, and women are sexually of course. All else is stupid"
(Man shall be trained for war and woman for the recreation of the warrior. All else is folly)
"When you approach a woman, remember to bring your whip."
(Thou goest to woman? Do not forget thy whip.)
Islamic civilization, another major civilization system in the world. The core verse "Quran" stipulates that polygamy (Polygamy) is allowed for men, with a maximum of four wives, and vice versa. Women who cheat on affair are to be stoned to death. This is Sharia, which is still practiced in Iran and some other Islamic theocracy countries.
Looking at Indian civilization again, in the South Asian subcontinent, Hindu culture also discriminates against women: Before the mid-19th century, there was a tradition in Hinduism called "SATI": if a woman’s husband dies, she must jump at her husband’s funeral. Self-immolation in the fire. Because this is the most loyal manifestation...
and in our Far Eastern civilization, the most indigenous and influential Confucianism, we are all familiar with gender inequality (in fact, discrimination against women), and there is no need to emphasize it here. Narrated. Go to the vast countryside to see how many people are desperately giving birth to sons, and you can see the leopard in your eyes.
The issue of gender inequality has been entangled since the beginning of human civilization. The continuation of the "patriarchal clan" civilization occupies almost all the major civilization systems in the world.
Sartre's wife, Beauvoir, once wrote the book "Second Sex", which talked about discrimination against women. I have to say that male chauvinism or simply sexism can be described as ubiquitous and seamless.
Turkey has a thousand-year history of Islam. In such a country where Islam is the mainstay, women's chastity arches are naturally even more important. Even if they do not need to be stoned to death, they are not in line with the mainstream social ethics. The status of women is also extremely humble. In many cases, we should not only look at things from appearances. Mothers do these things for the welfare of their family members at the beginning. The starting point is good, but the approach is unethical. But—the son slapped his mother in the face, it seemed to me difficult to accept—even if it was an affair—and this kind of affair was more or less for the sake of his family in the beginning. As for the woman, it is obvious that the disharmony between her and her husband’s relationship is reflected in the movie, and she slowly falls into the whirlpool of love in the process of cheating. There is no reason for feelings. She herself is afraid it will be difficult to control. If it is not for the existence of male chauvinism, why should she swallow her breath? If you have been to your free life and are dissatisfied with your current marriage, you should end it and find your own "true love" (on the premise of being ethical, of course). It would be great to have lived a life free from traditional intolerance.
Some people may say that cheating is inherently immoral. This is true. I can't argue with it. However, I need to clarify that whether cheating is moral is not a question I want to discuss. What I want to complain about is gender inequality. Suppose, this father went out to cheat and was discovered by his own daughter (hypothesis). Does the daughter dare to slap her Lao Tzu? In the context of Islamic ethics and sexism, his behavior is discovered by his wife, and it is impossible for him to have such serious consequences as the reverse. These are all manifestations of gender inequality.
Why is the situation of women so miserable? Compared with men, why is the chastity archway more important to women? Why are women always at a relative disadvantage? Even physiologically.
View more about Three Monkeys reviews
