L: Let’s put it this way, if it’s in the form of "Three Watches", which means that three independent stories are combined, I can give a score of seven. The current three-line format, I’m sorry, I can only give a score of five. .
Q: Where is the problem?
L: Three lines. If you count the child, it should be four lines. In a story frame, people can't find the theme of the story. The writer and the singer-song-girl, separate, separate and unite, um, mutual understanding and mutual daring to take responsibility, lovers eventually become family members, maybe I want to say this; the love experience of a bald girl is to let us not be blinded by our eyes, to feel love with our heart, and to be courageous. Let yourself be loved; what about a pregnant woman and her man, when two people have a child, they bridged their previous differences, and taught us that it doesn’t matter where the two love each other; writers and children, good people are rewarded? ! Speaking of each line alone, the shots are actually pretty good. According to the order I mentioned above, they can be given eight points, seven points, six points, and seven points. Some small details can be seen with great care and can make People knowingly smile.
Q: The three main lines seem to be related to love. This should be the theme.
L: Love is the motif, not the theme. Every love is dangerous, every love is sweet, love needs persistence, etc. These belong to themes, but unfortunately, there is no unified theme in this film.
Q: Could it be that you are mentally retarded and can't see it?
L: It is possible, so there is no one-person jury. (Laughs) I can only appreciate according to my aesthetic level and tell me why. Therefore, no one should say "objective", no one should ride on others' heads. (Laughs) Sometimes, the charm and interest of art appreciation is here.
Q: I think, life itself has no theme. This kind of movie that keeps life authentic is quite good.
L: You are right. You cannot rule out the possibility that in New York, these three people are indeed friends, and the same story happened in the movie. But after all, movies cannot be equated with life, and the things in life cannot be brought out intact, so it is said to be a movie. For example, a monkey sitting in front of a typewriter, typing casually, typing a million words, no one said that this is a novel; no one said that pages 63 to 233 of Xinhua Dictionary are a novel; your diary, If there is no theme, it is just a normal diary or historical material. Only with a theme can it be a diary novel; another example of art, if you pour four bottles of ink on white paper, you say it is a work of art, it is you The brain is sick, and Picasso poured it out. Everyone said it was a work of art. As the last example, a good movie is like a tightly connected dam, and the theme is like water in the dam. The dam body of "The New Yorker's Story" is divided into four parts, the height of which is different, and there are dozens of meters in between Can you keep the water?
Q: I think it’s not bad for a movie to give me something, a sense, and a touch. I can give it full marks.
L: Do you pick an apple?
Q: Of course you have to choose.
L: Since every apple has flesh on it, why do you even pick it? !
Liu Qiang Ai's film "The New Yorker's Story", Episode 108: Movies are not life
View more about Happythankyoumoreplease reviews
