Real images, hypocritical civilization

The first time I saw a more real indigenous life in a movie, every time I watched the geography channel or the animal world, I saw beautiful nature, cute wild animals, and harmony between man and nature. So people say with emotion, ah, the earth has been destroyed by human industrial civilization, we want to return to the embrace of nature, always dreaming of being able to return to the woods and feel the beauty of nature. As an adult, he actively participated in the so-called "traveling" activities. After several times, I found that it is not enough without good equipment, without sufficient physical strength, and even without enough food. Although the mountains and rivers are beautiful, the smell is enough after a few days of drilling. I desperately snapped a few photos of wild flowers, so I could go back to the Internet and brag about it. In the end, no one cared about it. It was really an intermittent convulsion. Only when you are in the wild will you realize the horror of the mountains and the dark night, the annoyance of mosquitoes, flies and ants, and the ferocity of wild animals. The walk of the young lady brother was absolutely false, and it felt a lot more real when the little native appeared.
Dark and shiny skin, touch sticky hands, it is a mixture of animal blood and body fluids to prevent exposure to the sun, but the fishy smell attracts mosquitoes and flies to constantly surround the little natives. It is also very real to make bows and arrows from raw animal tendons. Of course, the exposed mummy is something they take for granted. In short, the images of indigenous life are quite real, even disgusting. Compared with the civilized people in the industrial society, it is curiosity. You can observe their original ecological life, you can ignore their dirty, bloody and disgusting things, and magnify the meaning of natural harmony. But it is difficult for you to choose to live with them when you walk out of modern life. It can be a vacation, but no one wants to get married and have children.
Therefore, the girl’s choice is very reasonable. She loves the beauty of nature but cannot do without the material and spiritual civilization of the times. Although the director said that this civilization is indifferent and hypocritical, but without this civilization, the director does not have a camera film to shoot movies. The development of civilization must be progressive and bring people a better life, although from another angle it also reflects hypocrisy and destruction of nature. But the vast majority of people chose to live a civilized life, even if they were exploited and enslaved by a small number of people. In any case, the ability of human beings to transform nature is constantly strengthened, even if it is to destroy the earth, because human beings are also part of the earth, and its essence is also the change in the form of part of the earth's material energy. Whether you like nature or overexploit and destroy nature, it is also a macroscopic view. It's just the intermittent convulsions of nature. In case of a violent convulsion, a big guy with natural disasters, man-made disasters or something will fart together, there is no way, who makes everyone a part of nature.

View more about Walkabout reviews