A more malicious situation

Winnifred 2022-01-12 08:01:41

There are too many film and television works in the Henry VIII period. The British film "A Man For All Seasons" in 1966, the most unique thing is that it focused on capturing a complex and unspeakable situation. . Regarding this situation, we can start with the experience of Jesus in the Bible. When Lin Yutang talked about materialism in his book "From Pagan to Christianity", he quoted a sentence from Jesus: "Caesar's things belong to Caesar, and God's things belong to God." However, the intention here is not to try to distinguish between the kingdom of the material world and the kingdom of spiritual faith. This sentence is only used to respond to the malicious framed by "hypocrites"-"New Testament Matthew" The incident recorded in chapter 22 verses 15-17. While Sir Thomas More, the British Prime Minister during Henry VIII, a loyal Catholic, encountered some different problems. His dilemma did not come from choosing himself. Whether he was loyal to the king or faith was just one of the reasons for the tragedy. . More claims to be not a martyr. He is a man who respects rationality and order. He not only adheres to principles, but also tries to seek the protection of the law to protect himself. So in the end, the most malicious place in this situation is that such a clever and wise person has personally experienced the destruction of reason. The justice he defends may never really exist.

The editing technique of "People of Four Seasons" is very eye-catching-because it is cut so concisely! Each scene is a paragraph, and there is almost no plot transition. For modern audiences, it may have become old and out of date, just like a stage play. It’s just that in this film, this exhaustively directed style has received excellent results. Not only did it not weaken the exquisiteness of the work itself, on the other hand, it also made me feel that the style of the movie was integrated with the character of the protagonist himself. It couldn't be better-More is also an anachronistic character. The world describes him as rational, decent, honest, and wise, so the biographical film about him should be the same.

How can we not mention Robert Bolt's brilliant script? In just two hours, we have carried out a lively and interesting analysis and dialogue on a large number of issues such as law and power, faith and secularity, silence and speech, compromise and persistence... A huge complex, from the king, the powerful, the politician to the lower-class people, the language style of each character is appropriately displayed, and not even a single sentence is dispensable. More is an excellent eloquent lawyer and judge, so movie fans who like court debates will not be disappointed by the logical and step-by-step verbal battles in the film.

The actors who participated in the film also had an equally brilliant performance. After watching another "Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf" (Who's Afraid of Virginia Woolf?) in the same year, I was curious what kind of performance defeated Richard Burton and became the Oscar actor, and Paul Scofield in this film The performance, especially the precise grasp of the lines and tone, is an answer that I can agree with. Robert Shaw, who played Henry VIII, Wendy Hiller who played his wife Alice, etc. also left a very deep impression on me. Of course, the most famous actors in the film are supporting actors. In this film, John Hurt plays a young man who tries to climb up and finally sells his soul. Archbishop Wolsey, played by Orson Welles, is one of the opening characters. Minutes, but he has at least a few lines. The mistress Anne Boleyn is Vanessa Redgrave, perhaps one of the greatest actresses. She only appeared in a wedding scene. It took two or three shots for a short time without a single sentence. The lines, but her expression of expression in a flash still reveals extraordinary skills, and it also cleverly suggests that the marriage between the king and the new queen is not so harmonious.

Although most of the charm of this film comes from the drama itself, there are still many shots that are impressive. One of my favorites is the scene in which More walks home on a stormy night and meets his daughter Margaret. Fred Zinnemann, who directed this film, is a man of outstanding achievement. As an American director, his excellent control of this classic British film can be said to be impeccable.

The title of the film: "A Man For All Seasons" is an extremely compliment to the protagonist, and Sir Thomas More is indeed worthy of this title. As the most virtuous person in British history, he is not only a model of personality and morality, but also a famous philosopher. At the beginning of the film, in the living room at home, what the guest of honor is talking about is his immortal work "Utopia". As for whether this movie can be called "a film for all seasons", I think at least it drew a lot of the same valuable qualities from its protagonist: decent, concise, smart, and powerful. So, you should go to the movies instead of trying to listen to more nonsense from me.

http://www.pub8.net/review/man-for-all-seasons

View more about A Man for All Seasons reviews

Extended Reading

A Man for All Seasons quotes

  • The Duke of Norfolk: An artificial quarrel is not a quarrel.

  • Sir Thomas More: I will not give in, because I oppose it. Not my pride, not my spleen, nor any other of my appetites, but I do, l. Is there, in the midst of all this muscle, no sinew that serves no appetite?