When I saw wwe studios, I knew it must be a macho action movie. Sure enough, aside from the plot, the performance of the muscular man in the whole film is indeed full of vigor. Well, we know this is an action movie, so we are not so demanding of the plot, and we don't give pointers to a few crappy FBI, but the director, at least you need to find a photographer who knows what a movie is. I seriously suspect that this is a videographer who has just finished working from the WWE live broadcast site, and is completely unclear about what is a fixed position and what is a moving position. The most hateful thing is that the photographer zoomed in zoom out aimlessly in no less than 10 shots. Please, you are making a movie, not a DV. Have you ever seen a movie where out of focus, then out of focus, then out of focus, in the final editing, repeatedly makes you think that the computer screen is a problem? I'm afraid the editor can't find a good shot to put it in. There is also a sense of shaking that is very on-site. I would like to say that handheld shooting is indeed very effective, but after a handheld shooting followed by an orbit camera shooting, and then repeated several times, do you feel dizziness and nausea accompanied by bursts of weightlessness? Anyway, I watched the whole film amidst such irritability. Now think about it, how many movies are lost in the hands of a bad photographer. This includes the hot public enemies who were praised by countless youths in the humanities. Finally, the cry from the heart: screw you, shitty photographer!!!
View more about
12 Rounds reviews