——————————————————————————
I’ve heard of this movie a long time ago, but I haven't watched it for the following reasons: 1. I have a prejudice against it-this is a 1961 movie. My past experience is that old movies are not easy to taste. It is not that I am afraid that I won't be able to eat it. In my impression, there are no movies that are particularly difficult to understand (except for those deliberately to make people unable to understand)-but they are afraid of tastelessness. For example, some old comedies are all about the current maladies and satirize the Nazis or exploiters. They are all right, and the ridicule is in place, but they give me the feeling that they are not as good as current comedies. As for the ancient martial arts films, horror films, human XX films, etc., some of them now seem to have become comedies. Of course, I am not saying that these films have no value. As the pioneers and founders of the time, these films have an inestimable value in history, and they also influenced the thinking of a generation at that time. But I am a non-professional, it is impossible for me to do a lot of boring things for these very low value to me. 2. I heard that this is a film that can make some people feel dull. This is not because I have a guilty conscience when I hear of boring movies-Angel Loves Beauty and other movies that I think are good-looking are also considered by a small number of my classmates as super boring movies and criticized by some bully critics as "small farmer consciousness"—— It’s because I’m not interested in the plot I heard-a man falls in love with a woman and tells her past experiences, but women don’t remember such experiences. Men repeatedly "brainwashed" and finally made women "believe". Eloped together. This kind of plot makes me feel very monotonous and boring (now I know that the producer did not intend to make a complete story).
But I watched it recently. One reason is because I saw a lot of lively comments everywhere, which made me think the movie might be interesting. Although I have to say after watching it now, I think these comments are much better than the movie.
Such a low evaluation of the movie does not mean that I want to deny the movie’s viewing ability (I think there are still many people who can really appreciate the movie or even the related script), but because I rate non-XX movies more personally It depends not only on its connotation, but also on whether it can make me feel happy, horrible, sad, funny, ridiculous, beautiful, etc. It is a pity that except for a game that is said to be a key symbolic factor, I am interested. Men touch The picture of the woman brings a bit of sexual interest. The collapsed stone fence made me feel the metaphors of disappointment and injury. The description of the stone statue and its true background have some meaning. The dialogue makes me feel that I can study foreign languages by the way. The shooting shot symbolizes what is right. Apart from being a mystery, I didn't notice many other feelings with big edges and corners.
————————————————————————————
The following are related to the theme
———————————————— —————————————
I personally think that the key word to understand this movie is "limited possibilities", and this key word can be concentrated in the misère version of Nim in the game in the movie.
Let me first talk about my understanding of the role of that game after checking some network data.
The dialogue about that game probably first appeared at 12 minutes 52 to 59 seconds. It was a man who belittled the thin man M from behind: "That's nothing great. He had already calculated all the possibilities at the beginning." There was a competition, which lasted from 14 minutes 16 seconds to 15 minutes 31 seconds. It was the thin man M who used the Nim game to defeat the man X who was the protagonist who took the card first. Finally, the game ended with the laughter of heroine A. Some people say that the triangular card game metaphors the triangle relationship between these three people, and I think the last card metaphors X's relative failure in career or strategy. The second match was from 20 minutes 23 seconds to 21 minutes 10 seconds. M defeated the other person who took the card first, causing the latter to go away. From 21 minutes 11 seconds to 22 minutes 25 seconds, X learned his lesson and let M go first. Unfortunately, X made a mistake when he took the card for the second time and lost to M again. Later, at 36 minutes and 55 seconds, there was an M card deal scene. I think this comparison shows that X has a broader mind and a relatively good personality.
I think the most important thing is from 1 hour, 14 minutes, 24 seconds to 1 hour, 15 minutes and 40 seconds. There are many metaphors here. Most of the comments from the audience are somewhat ridiculous: "This is a stupid game!" "You have to know the trick." "You only need to take an odd number." "There must be some rules" "The first person to draw the card will always lose "I think Frank played that game last year." "You have to do calculations based on 7." "Which row?"
X let M go first, and let M take the first step as he said. Unfortunately, he doesn't Knowing that any other person's first step is the same, and he made a mistake in his own first step.
Later, the audience even talked nonsense, and Zhuge would not take it afterwards. "The starter will always win" "Just take an even number" "The smallest odd number" "This is a logarithmic series" "You must change the row to be taken each time" Finally, press the nim in the photo. Photo of Woman A in a triangle arrangement.
What is the metaphor here? My personal guess is that it is a metaphor that outsiders have less understanding of this love or career game and has less impact but likes to pretend to be clueless to make suggestions. It also metaphors that the one who starts first is not necessarily strong. Others say that the last card represents the heart of a woman, and that it won the opponent in strategy and career, but it does not necessarily win the heart of a woman. What is winning in real life? Winning health but losing career, losing career but winning health is not ideal; winning the battle but losing the war, winning the war but losing the popular support; winning the debate but losing the truth, winning the truth But lost friendship. These things are calculated by people and by the sky. It is worse than time to have the final say, and time to have the final say.
But here I talk about what I understand from the nim game, but I think it is not what the director intended to express (in fact, the above opinions of mine or others may also be misunderstood): 1. In real life, there are many choices for many things In a partial view, sometimes one step is wrong, sometimes one step is wrong, and sometimes, which step is taken first is not very important, as long as you act according to the right path, which is the best strategy. 2. Life seems to have infinite possibilities, but in fact, the choices are very limited. 3. Comments on things you don’t understand are likely to be wrong, no matter how deep or superficial the comments seem.
——————————————————————————
The source and gameplay of this game
First of all, that game, the Nim game, may have a lot of fate with us, because there is a saying that it originated from the game of picking stones in our country, and it is now phonetically/paraphrased as a game of twisting. Nim means to take.
This game seems simple, but there are some tricks. As soon as I saw that game, I wanted to use the reverse push method to crack it, but there are 4 or all of them are single or double, but 9 is very complicated, not to mention 16. Later, I thought that it might be related to binary calculation, but I couldn't know how to calculate it. No way, check it online. I found that a method that does not require programming requires the use of the Sprague Grundy theorem that I have never heard of. There is another simpler method on Wikipedia, using the binary correlation method to solve it, so I learned it. I found that the latter is still relatively easy to understand. I learned the number of wrong paths that I thought I understood and discovered X. If you play in accordance with the rules and card types in the movie, the final result will surely win as long as the latter follow the optimal strategy. I also checked it on Baidu and found that the simplified and normal version of this game was used as elementary school Mathematical Olympiad questions or example questions for explaining game theory, and the enhanced and complex version was used as some computer programming questions.
I also found some comments from other netizens, some said that this game is more fun than the movie. I think so too. In the future, I might be able to abuse unsuspecting children and make them think I am a clever fellow.
—————————————————————————————
The reference material used in this article
. The description of nim in the script and in the movie
http:// plambeck.org/archives/Marienbad.html
Nim game introduction, relatively simple common type and misere type solution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nim
Sprague Grundy theorem
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sprague-Grundy_theorem
——————————————————————————
Reference materials for others
1. Play this game online, if you want to win the game, let the computer go first ( Is anyone willing to lose?)
http://www.archimedes-lab.org/game_nim/play_nim_game.html
2. For elementary school Olympiad students. (Really hard-working children)
http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_41482c9f01009dc9.html
3. For programmers (it is not difficult to download and find)
http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article /CJFDTotal-ITSJ200802062.htm
4. People who want to understand game theory (game theory is really a term that looks very bullish, but I still think that left and right game is more powerful -guess what your choice is, Make your own rational choices based on your own rational choices and reactions)
http://info.sugoo.com/CN/Ebook/%E7%94%B5%E5%AD%90%E4%B9%A6%E7%B1% 8D/%E8%BF%90%E4%BD%9C%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86/%E5%8D%9A%E5%BC%88%E8%AE%BA/%E5%8D %9A%E5%BC%88%E8%AE%BA1.ppt
View more about Last Year at Marienbad reviews
