do not think the second part of their national identity and are dressed like Afghan horse I think the director is Is there something to be pointed out? If the first part is just a reflection on the social state similar to the Showa Folklore, then the second part can be said to be the director’s clearer political stance, which seems bolder. Directly, the first part only involves a group of minors and classmates killing each other in the country. A cruel fairy tale that is completely impossible to achieve. But can the scene and story in the second part really not find a prototype in reality? How many countries still In the real world, there is a killing "cannibalism", which is a derogatory word wherever it is put, but it is repeatedly chewed and played by reality again and again. Anyway, when I watch 2, I unconsciously think of Afghanistan. I think of the terrorist Laden Omar who is called the devil of the world. In the drama Fujiwara Ryu is also called the devil by the authorities. The extremely cruel terrorist horse is also indoctrinated to defend. the so-called justice and peace do
we are all in the same world, but sometimes we do not cherish the same dream that this world is not fair or not fair to say some of the normal extremes like the ancient slave society because of Chiang Kai-shek completely slaves Unrequited overpayment and loss of personal dignity will create an elegant and leisurely life of the nobles (Isn’t it said that the life state in ancient Greece and Rome was the most perfect? I regularly exercise every day to practice fighting skills and go to the big square to debate Discuss philosophy and regularly have large-scale song and dance performances to cultivate sentiment. Why do they have such leisurely and prosperous time-because they don’t need to work, why they can live a prosperous and luxurious life even if they don’t need to work because of the existence of slaves) It will give wise men like Socratie Boratou Aristotle enough space, time, energy and physical strength to learn and think.
Do you know that developed countries account for less than 20% of the world’s total population, but less than 20% of people account for more than 80% of the world’s resource wealth. Is this reasonable? To be more serious, in a sense, the poor people are the rich people (countries). slaves lived their lives not only as good as the quality of life as well as the intensity of labor is for them to surge in wealth for their wedding dress
so they can not help but mention that sentence weak and poor country in the modern world is another "rich people "slaves of the world, at least they think so, Mr. pulled it so that will be desperate to fight on the way as the year of Ge Wala persistent confrontation with
having said that the two are not strikingly similar to the movie and real-life example it obviously It is those people who force them to take the road of resistance. The absolute weak in front of these strong people are clamoring wildly but those people indignantly say that they are threatened. Yes, they do not allow their ruling order to be challenged by the slightest bit. The slaves under the slaughter should not have the slightest resistance or opportunity. .
View more about Battle Royale II reviews
