There are grievances all over the world, some of them are in the dark, and the rest is remembered by history... I respect the meaning of the film, but in terms of empathy, it's a little plain. First of all, there was not enough conflict. A large number of refugees gathered together. Several painful incidents should be discovered to deepen the impression. As a result, only the final shooting reflected the cruelty of the war. The Serbian army's evil deeds did not show too much inside, and there were even relief behaviors such as delivering bread and bus shuttles. In this contrast, although the contradictions of human nature are brought out, the heaviness is much lower. As a diplomatic interpreter, the hostess has a very low status and does not receive the respect she deserves. On the issue of protecting father and son, the troops in charge of peacekeeping were unwilling to get involved. From this, she could feel the helplessness in her heart: she couldn't stop the death, she could only see it with her own eyes. The children’s performance on the stage returns to the theme of peace: remembering deeply, don’t resent those who are alive, reflect on the damage caused by war, and strive to create a better future for the next generation.
View more about Quo Vadis, Aida? reviews
