I don’t know the curse of Indian movies. The basic key information in the first hour of the movie is very little. The playwrights, security guards, and the elderly who collect the ashes, but most of them talk about the suffering of family members. The plot as an atonement is too long. For the main line of the story, The audience can watch a few plots and it will not affect the judgment of the main line at all.
The first part is worthy of four stars. The protagonist is calm and unyielding. This one also saw unyielding in the end. Sometimes there was too much panic in the front, and only the few calmness suitable for the court to retract the confession appeared.
The overall plot is pretty straightforward, with a relatively large element of luck, but the film is forced to come back. The forensic evidence box was originally unsealed. Looking at the background of the village, poverty, backwardness, and public power, it can be said Pass.
The whole is not as good as the first one. The first one mostly tests personal wisdom, and this one depends on luck. The part of writing the novel was really a magical touch. It overturned the witness's testimony and the police's reasoning. It changed the bones and had a lot of luck. As a result, they returned the three-span bones because of the redemption. Do you want to make another one!
What is justice is nothing more than a means taken by the ruling class for the sake of social stability. Justice is not sometimes done for the victims, but for telling others to "see, the result of the bad guys is like this." One is to warn the ruled groups. The second is to appease the ruled groups, but seldom pay attention to the loss of the victims, but the rulers want to show off "We sympathize with you and serve you justice." Just like many media propaganda that "justice will be late, but will not be absent" is a nonsense. Such media really want to bring justice to you.
"Look, this is justice"
View more about Drishyam 2 reviews
