After reading it, I wonder if there really is such a period of "black" cloud over the city in American history? If so, the yellow brothers will show their pity, and at the same time they will also be outraged at all the nonsense of the history books. How is it actually? It turned out to be a politically ill-minded teacher Griffiths who saw the work of the southern writer Thomas Dickens, "The Clan", and thought it was a good material for making a movie. Then he made a movie of the same name, which was changed to the exciting one when it was released. name. After that, he stabbed the hornet's nest. There were bans and condemnation. Everyone also suspected that "the director's conscience was eaten by dogs." Teacher Griffith made eleven Civil War movies, and finally accumulated experience in shooting war scenes and big movies. How did you think that everyone did not cherish their artistic achievements so much, so he wrote "The Emergence of Free Speech in the United States" "And Decline" in defense. In tit-for-tat, the scandal stimulated everyone's desire for voyeurism, so it became the best-selling movie until 1988. It is a pity that the vast majority of American youth and public enemies of conscience have not been nailed to the historical stigma, but have made a lot of money. Not only did they usher in the Hollywood era, but they also had the ability to make a difference in [Party Same Faith].
Regardless of its artistic value or historical role, [The Birth of a Nation] can be regarded as a hallowed movie, where the "Marble Man" and "Cameroon" are both lifelike. The biggest problem is that its scent of racism is easy to "teaching bad children." Refer to [Sex Book Tycoon] and [Victory of Will]. All of these involve the issue of freedom of speech. Movies are just movies, and their social significance is not enough to be a criterion for judging art or even the author himself. In fact, Gerald doesn't have any particular affection for racism. His original intention was to fight against the war, but he made the mistake of ethnocentrism. Having said that, this again involves the issue of "being clear by listening at the same time". When thinking exists only in one dimension and two dimensions, it is easy to be deceived and misled. If you have only seen [the birth of a country 1, 2, 3...] and the Global Times since childhood, you will definitely think that whites and blacks are bad species...No one can believe anything except us. Pinning someone on the pillar of shame at every turn, especially the ignorant literati poker artists, is a manifestation of a guilty conscience. There is no shame in the world. If you want to nail it, you can nail it in your heart. It is not a glorious thing to confuse the public.
http://www.mtime.com/my/underground1984/blog/1018302/
View more about The Birth of a Nation reviews
