Introduction to the premise, it has been more than ten years since I learned flying knowledge.
First of all, I can understand the people who commented on this film as "very ordinary". It is estimated that Captain Sally will also have the same evaluation. I recommend you to watch "Captain China" because at least you can understand it.
Next, I will analyze it from the perspective of film, flight professional, and plot.
A. Why can I evaluate this film with full marks? I first analyze it from the perspective of the film
The film’s narrative angle is "囧瑟夫" as the protagonist. The story always revolves around him in the narrative, and does not extend the content through the perspective of other passengers or gangsters. This will have a strong sense of substitution, because as a person, you It is true that you can only see what is happening in the immediate environment. At every key point of the movie, you will think, "If I am the co-pilot, what should I do?"
Secondly, this film is uncharacteristically. The hijacker killed the captain, the passenger, and a flight attendant (the protagonist’s wife). We don’t know whether there were any casualties in the cabin, just like "囧瑟夫". He also had no way of knowing that we were in the same situation and mental state as him. We did not expect that these people would be "killed" by the script. This is a foreign script model that I did not expect. In addition, when the lives of these people are threatened, the audience will follow the "囧瑟夫" to carry out the ultimate test of morality and responsibility-do I want to open the cockpit door? What is the intention of the hijacking, this film will naturally explain to the audience inadvertently, this is also a clever point.
B. From the perspective of flight professional analysis
I commented on it, not only an excellent feature film, but also a beautiful popular science film, telling people about what might happen in the cabin before boarding, and even hijacking.
This is simply a gift package for flying enthusiasts, because all the SOP (standard operating procedures), CHECKLIST (checklist), standard calls, and correct operation of the flight attitude in emergency situations in this film are exactly the same as the real one. I heard it wrong, it's exactly the same, absolutely professional, I'm going to call the crew on this point.
Imagine that in order to perform well, I don't know how much preparation and learning the actor "囧瑟夫" has done to deduce the qualities that a mature pilot should have. If you have a friend who knows someone who can fly professionally, you might as well recommend this film to him. It is best if you know Airbus. You may get the same high degree of answer.
Another question, how can a person who can't fly a plane (prerequisite to understand English) hijack a plane? How did a Muslim who was only 18 years old embarked on this road of no return, even though he was so eager to live, how eager to continue to live, and even helpless to talk to his mother, crying that he wanted to go home. All the people here are portrayed vividly, and there is no absolute bad person, but I always firmly believe that a good doctrine must require human beings to do good and hope for world peace.
C. BUG that some people think in the plot
1. After landing, it is clear that you can kill the robber in the end. If you have to let the robber find that he has a weapon, why not kill him? This audience member was 18 years old, and it was only when he was lost that he knew how to return to the plane to survive. Moreover, in the early stages of the hijacking, the pilot also saw that the 18-year-old brother had good intentions. He didn't want anyone to die. He also Don't want to die, do you not watch the movie carefully or do you have no compassion and empathy? Secondly, the pilot's left arm has been injured, and he may not be able to fight the robbers. Did you take the negotiator to eat?
2. Why tell the passengers to make an emergency landing? Even if you conceal that you want to make an emergency landing, the hijackers will still take hostages, and life threats will continue to exist. It would be better to tell the passengers that they have gained control, and tell them the actual arrangements that follow, so that the cabin and the cabin can cooperate most efficiently. The purpose is to reduce losses and ensure safety.
3. Why can’t a hijacker who is unconscious in the cockpit be killed directly? Firstly for moral reasons, and secondly for legal reasons. You may not be able to kill a pig if you want to kill a pig. Besides, if you want to kill a person, Yu Zefu is definitely unwilling. The murderer, secondly, from his perspective, he believes that the hijacker has been unconscious, restrained, and has lost the ability to fight back, so he is even more reluctant to kill. If it is not necessary to fight back to cause death, this legal responsibility is still to be borne.
4. The problem of special effects, most of the novices may think that this investment should be embezzled. How complex your aircraft’s control system may be, Xiaobai really can’t quantify the details, but there are many details. After all, it’s impossible to actually fly an aircraft and shoot in the sky, but this can be said to be an absolutely true restoration of the Airbus flight control system. Adding in the cost of building simulators, actor remuneration costs, learning costs, and post-production rendering of scenes outside the windshield, etc., it can be said that the cost of shooting is very high at this level. I am very optimistic about the director's future works. I don't believe we use time to speak.
5. I think it is necessary for the opening of the security check footage. My idea at the time was whether the film was an adaptation of a real incident. This effect has been achieved. If you start directly in the cabin, don't you find it more abrupt at the beginning?
Friends who are interested in flying, recommend the documentary series "Pilotseye", thank you for your patience to read.
View more about 7500 reviews
