Planet of the Apes series third

Kelli 2022-01-11 08:02:28

Infinitely backward: This is a landscape painting. The painter who painted that picture said, what is missing? It's me. I am a part of this landscape painting. So he regressed consciously and drew a picture of a landscape painting by an artist. Then, what was missing, I drew another painting of a landscape painting by a painter. Going back further, he continued to paint. When our painter regressed almost infinitely, he himself became a part of his landscape paintings, both the observer and the observed. In this special state, he would perceive that space-time is like a highway, with infinite lanes leading from the past to the future, but not leading to the same future. (The concept of a parallel world was born, not just a shuttle between time and space) A driver may crash, and b driver may be spared. Then the driver can change his future by changing the lane. In a speech at the Gulf Women’s Club, Gila said, I call on men and let us (women) play a role. (It’s a bit of antagonism between men and women, or to use the mouth of an ape to state the point of view at that time, women should play a role.) The feeling of visiting the city always feels like showing off this treasure, or consuming its value to society. (It can't be used as scientific research, so there are only two words for rare.) And Gila is a little fascinated by the products of human society, such as clothes, such as the comfort of a bathtub, such as grape juice. And Corconis is cautious, commenting on cruelty when watching a boxing match, alertness when measuring clothes, and satisfaction after fitting. This is close to the attitude when we first met humans. Gila’s honesty, a kind-hearted woman was mistaken by human hospitality for being a good human, and wanted to confess everything, but Corknes was obviously more rational, and it was a wise choice to make discord under unclear circumstances, but Ji The premise that the two humans that La knows are good people is misleading (and how can humans be bad under the dominance of the apes), leading her to feel that the truth she has said can be compared to the humans she knows, but she does not know that it has been used by humans. In the hospitable atmosphere, everything implies that in a peaceful society of mankind, no one knows how much trouble it would be to reveal the relationship between man and ape. Gila only said that this was a battle of gorillas. In the back, I don't know if there was a war with people. In the end, I saw the destruction of the earth in space, and neither the humans nor the apes won. The senior adviser to the president said that the apes will dominate the earth and eventually destroy the earth in 3950. This is an excuse for racial opposition. And if you kill these two apes, will the future change? Is the current good wine and meat entertainment just really letting the apes relax their guard? The president said: Our two guests seem to be charming, they are peace-loving people, they should be creatures, and voters like them (they become treasures for the world) People watch, and this is very humane in the eyes of animal protectionists). The consultant said: Mr. President, do you want them and their descendants to rule the world? The president said: No, not for the next election. (The apes are elected?) Even if that happens one day, who knows, they might do better than us. (Ironic now that human beings promote the development of science and technology at the cost of destroying the earth?) The consultant asks: Will the world be destroyed? (To be honest, narrow-minded nationalism, why is the destruction of apes, but not humans? To be honest, no matter who destroys, it’s not right to destroy itself, but also to guard against the ape's heart, although foreigners may have outer hearts , But confrontation is obviously the easiest and most inciting approach) The President asked: Do you really believe that they have seen the destruction of the world? The consultant asked: Don't you believe it? The president said: I just calmly believe that this is a possibility, rather than hysterically thinking that it is a fact. The consultant said: We have their testimony, and it was they who provoked the war. The President said: They seem to make you very interesting. I didn't say you were wrong Haslin. Before I believe their omen, to convince me that the omen is true, please convince me. Do you really believe that with modern capabilities, we can resist this possibility? (Let the offspring of Gila not be intelligent) Can we change the future? Can. Do you also believe that we should (do this)? If we have the power to change the future, do we have the right to use it? I have no idea. I will fight it, Mr. President. I just don't know. How much future is there? Which future has a God, (parallel worlds) whether there is a God who chooses the destiny for mankind? If I encourage the destruction of these two apes, do I disobey or obey God's will? (With the help of Almighty God is God's will, even if it is wrong, it is God's pot, and it can be recovered) Am I his enemy or his tool? We forgive the assassination of Hitler because he was evil. (Evil is also the name given to him by the victor, in general there have been more) But shall we assassinate him in his infancy? He is innocent. Kill his mother? But he was in her belly. Kill his distant ancestor? Haslin, we have no evidence that these apes are evil. Unless there is evidence to prove it. some. When they answered the committee, there were hesitations and small differences. This reminds me that if they are thoroughly interrogated (a trick?). Are you saying that the questioning of them was not thorough? Is unprofessional. How professional? Fully professional, Mr. President. Tell the committee that I respect their opinions. (The president just needs an excuse to tell the masses) At the request of the president to convene this secret meeting, the committee made the following interim recommendations: Cheng Yong’s suggestion) 1. The public should understand that these apes have gone through a difficult space journey (for foreigners, it cannot be regarded as compulsory help through various reasons that seem to be very concerned, regardless of whether it is beneficial to each other. This is also part of the public welfare today. The appearance of the event is only part of it, just to satisfy the donor’s vanity and repentance) and the exhaustion of public welfare activities. Rest and arrange in a place where there is no interference. (Incarceration? Surveillance?) will not be disclosed to the public. . 2. However, since there are good reasons to suspect that they have concealed vital information from the committee, the ape astronauts actually went to Camp 11 accompanied by the zoologist Dr. Dixon, and were questioned by the CIA. The senior advisor Dr. Haslin Under the guidance and supervision. (Entering people’s territory, still under the guidance, called guidance, and then tortured to confess? Also beautify this is guidance, rather than civilizing lower races, because the ape can talk, a shameful act with just the right trimmings) When you are drunk Why tell Dr. Hasling that the earth is destroyed, but not tell the committee when he is awake? (Questioning consciously) Are you and your husband worried about your unborn child? (I shouldn’t worry about telling the situation that the relationship between the apes and the apes will take place in the future, but the interviewer acquiesced that the relationship between the apes and the apes will deteriorate, so I further asked if I was afraid that children would be intolerable by the current human society.) I did not hide anything from no one Asked me. (Dr. Gila is too naive) But if anyone asks. I should have said that chimpanzees have nothing to do with the destruction of the earth. It’s just the difference between a gorilla and a gorilla (the culprit in the war), you are all monkeys. Please don't use the word "monkey". This is an offense to us. As an archaeologist (Corknes), I have come into contact with some scrolls that are kept secret from the public. I suspect that the weapons that destroy the earth are humans’ own inventions. But I know that one of the reasons for the demise of mankind is your unique habit of killing each other. (It's just that the class contradiction between apes is not strong yet, and the scene where the ape caught the scholar in the second part is a fuse.) Humans kill humans, but apes will not kill apes. Wait a minute, this is not an argument about race, but a search for facts. We do not deny that humans may perish, we want to find out the rise of apes. That was in prehistoric times. The plague ravaged dogs and cats. (This setting is a bit similar to the black death smallpox in the Middle Ages. Will there be living experiments when the witches are burned to death?) They can only be burned. Humans have no pets, which is intolerable. Humans can kill each other, but they won't kill their own dogs. (This was only fashionable at the time, and it might not be right to kill one's pet in the current view). Therefore, humans regard primitive apes as pets. The primitive can't speak, but is 20 times smarter than cats and dogs (how to raise such a big one). They were kept in cages, and they were still free to live and move. They respond positively to human voices. In less than two hundred years, they have developed from a pure performance into a performance industry. Well-trained sheepdogs can do it too. Can shepherd dogs cook and clean the house? Can I go shopping according to the housewife's list? (This is not the concept of a pet and a servant as one? I really dare to think about it) Can I serve the meal? ? Can you become the master of the table in three hundred years? They have an understanding of the concept of slavery (one for food and drink, one for labor, this is true, suffering from unequal value exchange), and their number has increased sharply (because of the rapid development of the performance industry and human beings’ favor of primitive apes). The surge in demand), the abolition of slavery, of course, is unity (this is a bit like the liberation of slaves, after the liberation of the mind, many new things are a bit fanciful, but it is because of his whimsical ideas that are very beneficial to himself that they will become spread. The weapon was quickly accepted and improved, and overturned the old-fashioned dross (what the winners said). This is also the most appropriate explanation for the replacement of the old and the new. It is indeed suitable for the new era.) At first, they gathered in small groups and they learned Unity and martial arts, they learn to refuse. At first, they just hummed and refused. However, on a historic day, Aldo appeared. He did not hum. He said clearly that he said a word that humans have said to him countless times-no . (Starting to consciously guide again) "The apes in our place speak, but humans can't speak." Did you hear that your husband said to the committee? Yes. Humans can't speak, are they happy? (This question is also very insidious, just like you asked the person who introduced you to learn the car for the price of the test car. You have a long time to learn and there is a discount, but the student who introduced you to the learner did not practice for too long when he originally practiced. There is no discount, but the student asks you for the price. If your answer is okay, the student will tell you that I am also at this price. If your answer is cheaper, the student’s heart is definitely not good.) "As for human beings, I will dissect..., I have studied thousands of people carefully, and until now, I found that there are only two people who can talk to me. "Why did you change the words in the words?" Dissecting, dissecting, dissecting (repeating and deepening, asking them to say the whole thing) (at first tense) like hiccups. Hahaha. Please give him an injection, Dr. Dixon. I am a zoologist. Dr. Dixon, a veterinary expert, you have the authorization of the committee and the authorization of the president. In doing so, Dixon may be said to be a sinner again.) Finally, the committee decided that in order to prevent humans from being endangered hundreds of years later, Gila's pregnancy should be suspended and the two apes should be humanely removed. Apes and humans treat animals in the same way, but the former will consciously reflect but cannot remove the roots of inferiority, while humans choose to conceal or modify them more vigorously. There is no need for the scene of killing the orderly soldiers, but for the sake of the "present People think of apes as human beings. Since they kill, they can change their lives. The apes must die.” The circus leader’s remark was quite right. We are not rude to each other, so why should we be rude to animals? (If yes Little lives are in awe, and they basically do what they say and do.) The head of the circus said to Gila: “Because I hate those who try to change their destiny. This is God’s will and is unchangeable. If the destiny of a person is to be ruled one day, it will be yours. "(This is weird, but English seems to mean it too. Anyway, it means that you don't want to be dominated by bureaucrats, or dominated by new apes who dare to reflect. There will always be innovations in new things?) Korknes Say: When that moment comes, please let us commit suicide. (The last dignity of the apes) The senior consultant said: It’s too late. We will face pollution. It is too late, we will face a population explosion. If it is too late, we will face a nuclear war. We Believe that the world has always been dominated by us (this crisis awareness is very strong, but the problems mentioned above are obviously predictable, and it is really bad to consume future resources to pay for the current technology), but how long can the world be dominated What? Humans must be alert. (Not only to be aware of whether their dominant position will be subverted, whether there will be revolutionary struggles in their own class society, but also to be aware of whether their current turbulent behavior will destroy the future) Why does Gila want Did someone find the lost handbag? Why did the senior consultant dare to go to their hiding place alone? Gila said that I believe three human beings (Taylor, Brent, Dixon and his wife, Doctor, are all four.) )? How can primitive chimpanzees in the circus exchange children with Gila? Is the senior advisor for the benefit of the country or the personal safety of the human race, or is it just a distrust of foreigners and insists on killing? And this Perseverance, is it subject to his thinking, or is it just human instinct, or driven by interests? Does he also represent another group of people who are different from the president's doves? A place for innovation? ) Corknes said: When that moment comes, please let us commit suicide. (The last dignity of apes) The senior consultant said: It's too late. We will face pollution. Too late, we are about to face a population explosion. Too late, we are about to face a nuclear war. We believe that the world has always been dominated by us (this crisis awareness is very strong, but the problems mentioned above are obviously predictable, and it is really bad to consume future resources to pay for the current technology), but can dominate the world How long does it take? Humans must be alert. (Not only to be aware of whether your dominant position will be subverted, whether there will be revolutionary struggles in your class society, but also to be aware of whether your current turbulent behavior will damage the future) Why did Gila lose her handbag and be discovered Woolen cloth? Why do senior consultants dare to go to their hiding place alone? Gila said he believed in 3 human beings (Taylor, Brent, Dixon, and his wife, Doctor, are all 4)? How can primitive chimps in the circus exchange children with Gila? Is the senior advisor for the benefit of the country or the personal safety of the human race, or is it just a distrust of foreigners and insists on killing? And this kind of persistence is subject to his thinking or just human instinct, or driven by interests. Does he also represent another group of people who are different from the president's doves? A place for innovation? ) Corknes said: When that moment comes, please let us commit suicide. (The last dignity of apes) The senior consultant said: It's too late. We will face pollution. Too late, we are about to face a population explosion. Too late, we are about to face a nuclear war. We believe that the world has always been dominated by us (this crisis awareness is very strong, but the problems mentioned above are obviously predictable, and it is really bad to consume future resources to pay for the current technology), but can dominate the world How long does it take? Humans must be alert. (Not only to be aware of whether your dominant position will be subverted, whether there will be revolutionary struggles in your class society, but also to be aware of whether your current turbulent behavior will damage the future) Why did Gila lose her handbag and be discovered Woolen cloth? Why do senior consultants dare to go to their hiding place alone? Gila said he believed in 3 human beings (Taylor, Brent, Dixon, and his wife, Doctor, are all 4)? How can primitive chimps in the circus exchange children with Gila? Is the senior advisor for the benefit of the country or the personal safety of the human race, or is it just a distrust of foreigners and insists on killing? And this kind of persistence is subject to his thinking or just human instinct, or driven by interests. Does he also represent another group of people who are different from the president's doves?

Temporary home, still equal
The president here is worthy of fun, frivolous tone and justice

View more about Escape from the Planet of the Apes reviews

Extended Reading

Escape from the Planet of the Apes quotes

  • Dr. Otto Hasslein: Zira, wine is an excellent restorative, I assure you, especially in cases of pregnancy.

  • Chairman of the President's Committee of Inquiry: [referring to Cornelius] Does the other one talk?

    Cornelius: [indicating Zira] Only when she lets me.