There is a purely painted version of the dazzling vision before, and this version shows the big star. The two versions have a common feature, that is, the Van Gogh myth is completely washed away. The directors of the two films are not only the problem of private goods, they are simply clear. It is to be deified and thoroughly cleansed, huh? It's not good, history is a little girl who can be dressed up, let alone a painter.
I came from a pure oil painting background, but my view of Van Gogh is still different from that of the mainstream. This is even more of a kneeling and assistance to the mainstream judgment. In fact, it is not objective. After Van Gogh contracted syphilis, there was no penicillin at that time, syphilis caused encephalitis, so people always have hallucinations and emotions. Van Gogh was not a representative of poor painters and martyrs, at least he himself didn't want to live like this, it was simply impossible. These disasters really made him, and deified all of them, which is certainly a distortion for Van Gogh.
But why do you want to score high again? Because it's better to shoot than not, and it's better than not to shoot. At least it has spread the history of art, this kind of marginal culture still needs to be promoted and disseminated urgently. It's better to do a little bit instead of letting the public know nothing. After the National Art Museum of China opened for free, the first time rushed in were the aunts who wanted to wash vegetables with free tap water. So there is still value and meaning. Distortion is also stronger than nothing. It deserves encouragement.
View more about At Eternity's Gate reviews
