As a girl, the social education of her parents and teachers since childhood is that girls should learn to protect themselves outside, do not get drunk casually, do not dress exposed, do not walk alone at night, and learn to avoid unnecessary harm as much as possible.
As a person, what is taught by parents and teachers from childhood is that people should learn to protect themselves when they are outside, try not to conflict with other people's body language, and ignore them when they encounter lunatics.
I still remember an English reading about the cat kicking effect that I did: One car almost rear-ended another car. The driver of one of the cars was supposed to be mainly responsible but yelled at the other driver. The driver just looked at him with a smile. At the end of the article, the author roughly expressed this meaning: Some people are emotional garbage trucks. They drive around and dump negative emotions on others. We can't be such people and expressed praise for the tolerant drivers.
At first glance, there is nothing wrong with it. But when I think about it, I always feel a little uncomfortable. For those who tolerate, they avoid conflicts and don't let those "garbage trucks" affect their emotions. For the ninja, logic is self-consistent. But those "people who dump negative emotions" must be "garbage trucks"? Why can't you just fail to control your emotions for a while? Why arbitrarily classify a person as a "garbage truck" for just one thing? Why is the emphasis on "transmitting negative emotions to others" instead of "shirking responsibility after making mistakes"? I will not discuss the issue of whether or not to convey negative emotions to others. Even if it is so-called "wrong" to convey negative emotions to others, it is also a moral issue, and it is far from violating traffic rules that endangers oneself and the lives of others. . So why is this article uncomfortable? It blurs the contradiction. It pays too much attention to the epidermis, that is, we cannot be a person who spreads negative emotions. But what is really important about this matter is to pay attention to the traffic rules. Even if you accidentally violate it, you must admit your mistakes immediately. Don't shirk responsibility and cause more conflicts, but it is completely blurred.
Let's just switch roles. If the driver who lost his temper was the implicated driver, would you still think he shouldn't yell? Imagine that you are on a day's work, dragging your tired body, driving your car and getting ready to go home and rest. At this time, a car flew out in the sky, and you almost thought you were going to die. You slammed on the brakes and honked your horn. During the process of experiencing the heart rate from 120 to 70, you raised your feelings towards the driver. Raging. If it is you, can you control yourself to talk to the driver peacefully? If you are yelling and you are detained as a "garbage truck", do you feel good in your heart?
At this time, we felt something was wrong, and it was uncomfortable, because I was a victim. But sorry, according to the logic summarized by the author at the end, the person who "passes negative emotions to others" is a "garbage truck."
This makes me think of a very popular saying before, "Don't talk about the length with a fool." So at the beginning, we stood on the commanding heights, first characterized others as "stupid" or "garbage truck", and then from our own perspective, told ourselves not to care about them. From a certain perspective, this does have a certain positive effect. But let's think about it again, aren't we also "stupid" and "garbage truck" in the eyes of others?
This is a contradiction. So some people start to attack this sentence again: Are you a fool? You think others are a fool, and others don't treat you as a fool. But from the perspective of life, do these seemingly crooked remarks have a positive effect? Of course there is. Sometimes when we see the facts clearly but cannot change it, it is also a kind of wisdom to be able to stop ourselves from being depressed with the spirit of Ah Q.
So what does it have to do with "Blood Tribulation Pear Flower" after talking so much? Yes, of course.
When we see or experience some things (women being raped, some people venting negative emotions inexplicably, arguing with others...), we find a rule to protect ourselves: girls should not be exposed to clothing, and don’t spread negative emotions. People, don't talk about lengths with fools...These laws are right, even if there are extreme places, you can't say that they are wrong-they do protect a lot of people, in a simple and rude way.
So where is the source of the dispute about this kind of thing? If you compare life to a game, we in the game find out the rules and share them with others in order to play this game better. If you follow these rules, you can relatively reduce the chance of being out. At this time, some players didn’t know enough about the game (the raped woman did not expect to be sexually assaulted by the man), and did not act carefully according to the rules, and then was punished for bad luck (like a pub in a movie) Cameras, those people will not be so unscrupulous), some people jumped out and accused you of disrespecting the law. If you don't respect the law, you deserved it. But the real perpetrators have not received the punishment they deserve.
So what is the fundamental way to solve it? It is people who realize that for those who are hurt by carelessness or carelessness without respecting the law, we must give sympathy and care. What we should say is that you have done nothing wrong, it is those people who are wrong, they are very bad, But they exist objectively and will always exist for a long time in the future. We should try our best to avoid being harmed by them. Rather than the accusation that you deserved it when you did it wrong. Because these so-called "wrong things" are completely unequal to the harm they have suffered.
Only in this way can the perpetrators truly realize their mistakes, and more people with violent tendencies can discover some of their unhealthy mentality earlier, and avoid this mentality that really causes them to do anything out of the ordinary.
Finally talk about this movie. The last part where Jodie Foster dances is really fucking sexy. I have always felt very depressed when I watched this movie, but it is really sexy. But I will not be tolerant of those rapists. All evil and adultery are headed, and the argument is irrelevant. I sigh in my heart, and look at more eyes. Human nature is nothing. But if you really stretch out your magic claws, use violence and coercion, and use words to insult, that should be punished by law.
I watched the abridged version. Later, when I looked at the short comment, I found that there was actually a rape scene, but I was very lucky that I didn't watch it. I really like a beautiful body. I like to see beautiful women basking on the beach with naked skin, and I like everything that is beautiful and natural. But rape, full of conquest and oppression, is the abuse of the strong against the weak (physical only). For those who only went to the rape scene and sighed, ah, good breasts, really enjoyable, I just want to say
FUCK OFF!
View more about The Accused reviews
