If it weren't for his melancholy look suitable for burial of dead children and the dark blue background attracted For me, I think it’s hard for me to see a movie based on such a famous book. I get close to the rich dark cyan, close to the buildings that have gone through hundreds of years, and are still sharp and angular, and in the oldest and poorest wooden house, it also gives me a sense of contemporaryity not far away. Therefore, perhaps we have transplanted the civilization passed down in the West, replacing gold and silver with steel, replacing wood with plastic, and replacing Eguan belts with suits and casual clothes, with fluttering clothes.
Perhaps it is because it is "famous" that it is often shelved by people, or people think that the so-called masterpieces are things on the side of the road, and everyone can see it, but everyone will despise it to learn more, and be regarded by people around them. It is not to read masterpieces, because they have been read secretly a long time ago; people think that masterpieces are accessories, luxury goods, a vase that symbolizes basic human knowledge and is rarely wiped.
The movie "Orphans in the Fog", it profoundly presents the life of the bottom of society, liars, thieves, prostitutes, robbers...evil dogs, how do they shuttle among gentlemen, how to live without production, and try not to disturb the market. His life, let the gentlemen in high hats and the ladies in skirts, who knew or didn’t know, pass by on the street paved with brown slabs, expressing affection.
The realist sense of truth also gives me a sense of presence through time and space. The highest honor is still based on the theme of reality, and the best comment is to pull the work from life into life, abandoning technology, technique, deduction, and memory.
"Orphan Twist" is about old things in London. It has been for many generations, but the black mice flying through the narrow streets of London, the pitted muddy water flying up on a rainy day, I seem to see a modern man waiting to trade drugs , I seem to see the other one who is carrying a schoolbag and wearing overshoes, probing the way to elementary school with one foot and one foot shallow. And in those dark and narrow streets of London, a child is leading another child through it freely. They avoid a group of people fighting for a little sesame thing, or a group of gangsters robbing a woman. Middle-aged and elderly people; if we blink again, we can see a child being chased by a group of children led by a ragged old man. The child is finally blocked in a corner and picked up like a mouse. He Not even struggling anymore, like a dead mouse, just waiting for people to lose interest in it, then throw its body away.
In the story, the children are all thieves who were domesticated by an old man. They stole the handkerchiefs of the English gentlemen in the Middle Ages and their wallets. With luck, they were able to steal necklaces and pocket watches inlaid with gems. When they were hungry, They can steal bread effortlessly... They are all older than him. The younger children only need some food and they can walk around in the street. The older children know that they have hidden some coins, but they all pay them back. Not the age to be interested in women. The old man is the teacher to all of them, even the prostitutes. The old man commanded them, became their father, and collected their jewelry.
Those two young women, the reason I thought they were prostitutes from the beginning, was because besides that, I couldn’t think of two young women who had no family and no occupation, so they had passed the age of the thieves' hands and feet but were plump. What else can you do if you want to live. This is just like the unmarried mother in "Les Miserables" who fostered her child to others. Even though she has always hoped to use her own hands to earn money and feed her children, she does not have a gentleman husband with a civilized rod. The poor man who made bread, she finally became a prostitute. However, it’s just betrayal and coincident with what we think: prostitutes are also kind, at least they can’t bear to hurt a child, and they don’t want to add another melancholic and beloved orphan to the pile of thieves made up of orphans-this orphan is He escaped from another demon and walked to London for the first seven days. How did he know that London, where the city was imagined to be full of gentlemen and ladies, gave him a darker cage shortly after his arrival. .
One of them said: Everyone here is a thief, even the dog. It is more vicious, and even if it is dead, it will not lose its mouth and confess a accomplice like a man.
Dogs cannot confess or betray people. Therefore, tracking a dog’s whereabouts should not make any sense. However, it is this dog who witnessed a robber beat a whistleblower with a stick to death. It led The police killed its owner.
The old man survived, and the children may be dismissed. The old man went crazy in prison. He held the child, but the child said-I am not afraid of him. The child said-you are good to me.
What is the sin of the child? He had no parents for a long time and was bullied; he was taken into a thief’s den and happily learned to pick up a handkerchief quietly from other people’s pockets; he was chased and fleeing; he put on clean and decent clothes, Sitting under the tree and reading.
What's wrong with the child? Why did he walk to London for seven days?
Fortunately, his death is not mentioned in the story, although death is the final outcome.
This is a serious drama, not a tragedy.
Falling into the wild on March 18, 2007
View more about Oliver Twist reviews
