Generalize
Great, the only regret is that many historical figures, such as FD and John Brown, have not even explained their backgrounds, but I think if the historical group portraits are taken, the duration will be doubled. It can be seen that the crew has done enough to study Harriet's history, and the protagonist Harriet is very delicate. It's a pity that the last war scene was taken over, after all, that was the climax of Harriet's career. Harriet's reputation comes from war, not peace. Strictly speaking, as long as slavery is practiced and there is no war at Sumter Fortress, peace is also war. The peace of slavery is not true peace. The word slavery and the word peace are conflicts and contradictions. But after the war at Fort Sumter, the revolutionary war began vigorously, and Harriet's noble cause reached its culmination.
To be sorted out
This movie is so good, I cried many times when I watched it.
The only regret is that many historical figures, such as Frederick Douglas and John Brown , don’t even have any background information about the characters, but I think if the historical group portraits are taken, the length of time will be increased several times. Just make it into a series, I look forward to it.
The actors are very good, and their words and deeds are in line with the role identity and the background of the times. Taoism can be called the top level of this subject. I can only think of Spielberg's Lincoln biography of this level of film. It can be seen that the crew has done a lot of research on Harriet's history. The portrayal of the protagonist Harriet is also very delicate, but it is a pity that the final war scenes have been brought up in one stroke. After all, that was the climax of Harriet's career.
Harriet's reputation comes from war, not peace. Strictly speaking, as long as slavery is practiced and there is no war in the Sumter Fortress, peace is also war. The peace of slavery is not true peace. The word slavery and the word peace are conflicts and contradictions. But after the war at Fort Sumter, the revolutionary war began vigorously, and Harriet's noble cause reached its culmination.
I have watched this movie five times, and I don’t know what the protagonist’s psychic is mentioned by those critics. I haven’t seen a psychic plot for a second in the movie, so why is the psychic plot the biggest? The failure to say?
Among a large number of shameless attacks on this work in the comment area, the most typical one is that the film does not conform to history and does not pay attention to historical textual research.
I'm working on studying this history, but before I watched this movie, I didn't know which street the Pennsylvania Anti-Slavery Association was in Philadelphia. The crew was very sophisticated.
These people who attacked the details of the film are totally shameless. They didn't watch the film carefully at all, but said that the details of the film were not good. Are there any more shameful accusations than this?
Give another example. This group of people said that Harriet fainted at every turn, and was able to psychic, just like the goddess, the historical film was made into a fantasy film.
This kind of attack is ridiculous and only proves that this group of people actually know nothing about history.
Harriet suffered from narcolepsy because of the weight thrown by the slave owner when he was twelve or thirteen. This was the cause of fainting.
She and all the characters in it, as people in the religious revival era, would singing religious songs become missionary movies? Then in the filming of Confucius, feudal etiquette should not be taught, so does it conform to history if Confucius is not allowed to talk about benevolence, justice and etiquette in the movie? Are you satisfied with Confucius taking the students to go to the Die Di?
The so-called dialogue between Harriet and God, the movie shows exactly Harriet’s own hunch, isn’t it normal for people to have a hunch? It's just that she is a Christian. She interprets her premonition as a dialogue with God, which is completely reasonable and in line with the original history.
There are a large number of idiots in the comment area who don't know how to pretend to understand that this film vilified the whites because it turned whites into idiots and questioned how whites, if they were really so idiots, had enslaved blacks for hundreds of years.
White idiot? By the way, the idiots are some white slave owners (just as idiots as some Chinese), don't involve the whole white people, after all, abolitionists also have white people.
You don’t want to think about why there is a Harriet instead of thousands of Harriets. It’s because most white slave owners use vicious methods. Some idiots don’t matter at all, because these slave owners use various methods. Brainwashing slaves, and prohibiting slaves from learning everything related to freedom, and forcibly enslaving the entire black race to a real idiot. It does not matter that some white slave owners are idiots, because they think that all slaves are 10,000 times more idiots. They are right. .
Harriet is one of the lucky few.
However, the above question is actually misleading, because in fact the maintenance of slavery requires only pervasive force to suppress it, and it has nothing to do with whether it is clever or not.
I am sure that the comment section said that this movie talks about feminism and did not watch this movie at all. This movie is a biography of a great abolitionist. It talks about the American Civil War, the final battle between justice and evil, freedom and slavery.
A beast who hasn't watched a movie, pretending to have watched it and has a rhythm, is very contemptible. There are scolding people in the penalty bulletin board in the comment area, and there are people who say that if you haven't read it, you will get a star. The neo-Nazis are so rampant? What a jerk thing!
Do not forget that as early as thirty years ago, or even twenty years ago, on the second revolution in the United States and both are also cynical TV drama, historical revisionism spread, the actor playing slave owners heinous, blatant performance as the hero dirty And a false story . Even ten years ago, there were no movies about the true center of this history, great abolitionists, and people who fought for freedom and justice. There was not one at all. Now there is finally!
Such a great movie, such a shocking movie, is worth 5.9 points and a lot of scolding in China.
Is it because the protagonist is black? Is it because this movie is about anti-slavery, anti-authoritarian oppression, which touched some people's deep-rooted anti-truth and love for ignorance?
This is not a new phenomenon. The previous "Jones Free State" with the same theme and "The Birth of a Nation" in 2016, all reflect people's struggle for truth and justice, black people as the main positive role, and advocates of love and peace. , Acura films about freedom and equality, all are full of curse. On the contrary, everyone who advocates slavery, the slave owner takes the lead, glorifies slavery, and demonizes freedom, are all long live and high scores.
Must criticize this abominable evil thought!
I don’t want to know what kind of dirty stuff I’m stepping on, but I really want to know who my friends who agree with justice, wisdom, morality, and reason are.
Please be useful,
You didn’t actually order me,
You made the cry of justice!
Finally, thank you for shooting such an exciting work.
Please keep up!
"Harriet" ending song Chinese and English lyrics
recommend
View more about Harriet reviews
