The whole Steadicam-style combined lens, God-like subjective perspective is like "Under the Sphere of Berlin", witnessing 300-year history of Russia.
I firmly believe that clever movement is the best way to express in film. Such an experiment is worth trying.
There are several problems: 1. The extra lens makes the expression cumbersome. The most typical is pointless panning during transition. 2. Some subtleties reveal the placement of theater lights. When the door is opened, there is obvious reflection of people's light on the door. 3. The short-focus lens in the first five minutes lengthened the distance of the z-axis of the picture, exaggerating the vertical movement, and inevitably causing facial distortion. Why use short focus? I guess it's because the lighting can't be lifted up, and in the dark and snowy environment and small indoors, if you want to maintain a certain imaging effect, you can only use short focus. It is much more natural to switch to the focus of the human eye when it is indoors. 4. It is easy to make the audience faint and feel like watching a ghost movie. 5. Although trying to avoid the unnaturalness of the lens connection, there are still traces of the connection. 6. The appearance of stroboscopic movement too fast. So this old French man walks so slowly, with high heels clattering.
Their skirts are so beautiful! ! The lens used is expensive! !
View more about Russian Ark reviews
