It didn't take long for me to enter the pit of Meiman, about three years, and it was very shallow. Only when I was free, I would think of turning a few pages. It costs money to read the original English version, so most of the superhero comics I read are only Batman, Marvel’s Wolverine and Star Wars have read a bit (Marvel’s comics are very good).
My attitude towards superhero movies is that I was a fan of DC and X-Men at the beginning, and for a while I also liked the movies of the Marvel Universe for emotional reasons. In the past two years until now, I have become a black fan of Marvel, which is a coincidence. That relationship also ended without a problem two years ago.
Looking at the Marvel movies in the past two years, I only scored Ant-Man high. It seems that after that, I have no feeling about the movies of the Marvel Universe, and I am very disappointed after watching each one. I didn’t feel much about some movies before, but I will take it out and revisit it after a while to see if I didn’t have enough experience at the time or I didn’t find its sparkle. But for these recent Marvel movies, I don't have this idea at all. The American team 3 Civil War is so dissatisfied with this adaptation because of being deeply attracted by the original. A civil war that makes people think about justice and order, and reflect on war, has been turned into an infighting that focuses on "should you be punished if your friends kill someone involuntarily". If this time point is difficult to grasp for the Civil War, and the plan of Avengers 3 will be disrupted according to the original filming, then don't touch this subject at this stage, and wait for the big event of Thanos to use it as the third stage of the big move. At that time, there were more heroes available in the two camps, and the image of each hero was also fuller. I believe this will be more meaningful than a movie in which a large group of people gather to play the boss in the future. When Captain America was preparing for victory, he discovered that everything had deviated from his original intention, gave up his own ideas and ideas, chose to surrender and accept sanctions, and the moment he put down his shield was a manifestation of his spirit and personality. In the latter part of the movie, it was only to protect Bucky. Not to mention the narrow format. A Captain America movie also recruited so many blacks for the captain and attracted so many fans to the iron man. Is it reasonable? He even abandoned the principle of being a person for the sake of his friends. This is the point of view of the people around me who have watched this movie.
I haven't read the comics of the Twilight of the Gods, because I am not very interested in Thor, so I only read the introduction at station B. It stands to reason that this should be a tragic and heroic epic movie. How did it become a comedy? Moreover, the places that are deliberately made laughter are so dense that they come in an average of a few minutes, sometimes a few minutes, and even Stephen Chow's movies don't have that many laughs, okay? I sit among a bunch of Spaniards. Uncles and children laugh most often. Sometimes I am embarrassed because I often get some points but don't think it is funny. I don't deny that some places are quite funny, but at the cost of demonizing the character itself. Loki and Thor in the third part are the same, reduced to a laughing clown, with no divinity at all. The temperament of a god on earth is beyond doubt). It's a sigh that Loki's sharp edge that was shocked by the heavens in the first part has faded, only the hairline is still there. Sol didn't have the majesty that a king should have. He was too stupid. He wanted to throw a ball and hit him on the head. He was quite suitable to be a jester for the king. When they took the elevator to grab the spacecraft, the two of them talked and laughed, and used a special and funny distress tactic (socorro in Spanish, I don't know how to translate it into Chinese is the most appropriate). I wanted to sneer, but considering that the father and son next to him were so happy, I resisted it. Otherwise, when someone asked me why I sneered, it would really be a real sneer. Obviously it's an emergency in a hurry. Just give the enemy a quick shot, but it gives the impression that they don't care about the enemy's danger at all. This is just a fun game, it's better to take the opportunity to satisfy the rotten audience and sprinkle dog food. important. Do you still remember the awkward dance bridge section of Yinhu Yili, it was funny at first glance, and then I walked out of the cinema to think about it, what the hell is this?
It is said to be the Twilight of the Gods, but most of the time Thor is telling jokes with Hulk Rocky on another planet. He always told Loki, told Hulk and Valkyrie that Asgard was dangerous, and he wanted to go back quickly. But I can't feel any anxiety in him, it's more like the country being destroyed and the army being slaughtered is no big deal, because he is still in the mood to make jokes. Once the tone of the whole film is joyous, at the beginning, the father and the king are gone, the comrade in the middle is killed in battle, Sol is blinded by a blind eye, and Asgard is destroyed, there is nothing to touch. The people who survived at the end looked at the fire giant's wreckage and showed no contagious sadness, even abrupt and fake. Why are they so sad? This is a comedy, you should face it with a smile! Except for Hela's flying sword sweeping through the army, it is very handsome and the scene of Thor and Hulk duel is full of impact, there is nothing to watch, the plot is more boring than the previous two. How could there be the title of Marvel's best movie? Of course, every time Marvel releases a new movie, many platforms will make what is best to promote it. Originally, the father died, the hammer was destroyed, the country was destroyed, and the family was destroyed, and it was very sad for a prince to live in another country and become a slave. It could be used as the framework of a fantasy novel about the prince's restoration. Shouldn't it take this opportunity to let him go through mental and physical training, and after overcoming many sufferings, let him mentally grow from an Asgardian heir to a real Asgardian king? The moment his father left, he was burdened with the fate of a nation, and after the destruction of Asgard, he had to lead the tribe to rejuvenate. However, his awakening in the movie is a conversation with his fairy father, Asgard no es un lugar, es un pueblo (Asgard is not a place, but a nation) inexplicably stimulated the ability to discharge... this sentence I serve, very igniting and very passionate, forgive me for not knowing before that there is no country without people.
On the other hand, the movie style is very similar to Yinhu 2, as if by the same director. It's all the story failure to get special effects, and the jokes are collected. It seems that the important thing in the movie is no longer the hero, no longer the plot itself, but these useless jokes. When you try to get rid of these unnecessary things, you will find that the story itself is so boring and naive that you don't want to watch it a second time. In particular, the cause and effect of the story of Silver Guard 2 is simply a joke, and it can't stand scrutiny. The feelings between the characters are just blunt. You criticized the Martha Terrier and devalued it as worthless. Why did you turn a blind eye to the inconsistent sisterhood between Nebula and Camora. It’s worth mentioning that these two movies are Spanish versions that I watched with my friends. Most of the dialogues are not understood by my friends, but Ta guessed what is going on in each episode, which means that the whole plot is simple enough. When it is a silent film, the audience can see it clearly. However, the fact is that many people bought it. When he saw Groot selling cute, Batista said that his nipples were very sensitive, Thor showed his upper body muscles, and the two of them sold rotten (through the Fulian and Thor trilogy) as if Touched their G-spots and gave them crazy praise. I really don't understand how a series of family fun movies made from a single template are worth about eight points. Regarding the rating, I am very dissatisfied with the DC movie. What a bunch of brainless black guys do? "Superman can obviously break the general's neck but smashed half of the city. Superman's dad was blown away by a tornado to save a dog? Damn Batman murdered! Oh original mother The same name can be reconciled, the heroine is very virgin white lotus" and so on these bad reasons to give bad reviews. They don't use a little brain to think about the causes behind these behaviors. The film needs to be perfected, but is it correct to deny the whole film with a little flaw? Because it is very fun, it is very tolerant and indulgent about Marvel’s destruction of plots and characters. What is this kind of ethos? This is the reason why I resolutely stood in DC later. If one day Bare guides elementary school students to compromise, let Superman perform radio gymnastics in front of Darkside, and let Batman succeed in saving lives. Then I said "Alfred, you old man" I would ask Are you afraid?
Comics and movies are two different carriers, and when the original works are put on the screen, there will be changes. Many people who give bad reviews do not understand this truth, nor are they so rigid that they only need the US team and Sol to die to be satisfied. Then what about Infinite Warfare? But although it is said that the original work cannot be copied, whether most of the plot or essence of the original work can be retained without affecting the timeline of the entire series, I think it is completely possible. Hollywood will never lack talented screenwriters, nor will Disney lack. The money comes to invite them. Of course this is the most ideal. For example, the new X-Men, which is completely separated from the Marvel universe, must have many major changes. Everyone who has seen Wolverine 3 knows that it is different from the twilight wolf looking for a home, but no one has ever scolded it for being different from the original. In line with the like. But why do so many people jump out to scold Thor 3? The reason is that the plot is very perfunctory. Just looking at its story frame can indeed be connected with the Twilight of the Gods, and it will not conflict with the next Infinite War. But it shows jokes one after another, not to mention the essence and vigor of the original work, and even one story can't be finished seriously. There are 30 minutes to add jokes to complete. MCU can’t find a balance point between reproducing the original work and continuing the timeline of the movie universe, so it gives people the feeling that it is to promote the ultimate battle of Fulian 3, sacrificing these original works that should have been adapted into classics, in order to gather the heroes. , And give up exploring each hero's own, which buried the possibility of multi-faceted development. However, the US team 3 Thor 3 Silver Guard 2's role in promoting the main line is only to form a team, and it is not as effective as Thanos's glove and spacecraft to fly to the earth.
Dr. Strange, I gave a bad review, and I was so boring that I didn't want to comment. The persona that seemed unpleasant and annoying was simply a copy of the detective Sherlock. As for the new version of Spider-Man, I can only say that it is a pity that the first part of the series is out of the origin, which is very detrimental to the characterization of the entire hero, not to mention the use of Tony's equipment and the teaching of Tony. Although Uncle Ben has died on the screen twice before, he has a greater enlightenment significance than Iron Man in terms of Peter being a hero. Even if you don’t film the origin, you can still film the story that he just debuted before he became involved with Iron Man. By the way, he interspersed and flashed back to the scene at that time. Reproduce the scene where his parents were shot and killed. In the first year, the Dark Knight returns, Nolan's trilogy, which restores this scene to the most beautiful scene is Zadao). I want to watch him stumble all the way, but don't want to watch him play handsome in a high-tech suit. I want to see his confusion between the two identities of high school student and Spiderman, rather than having Iron Man come to help him in a big disaster. It was precisely because he was eager for quick success and quick profit to prove himself that he almost pulled a boat to bury him. If he understands that "the greater the ability, the greater the responsibility", he would have such an awareness when he became a Spider-Man, how can he dare to mess around again and again regardless of the consequences? It can be seen that he didn't have much regret and reflection after that. When Tony reprimanded him, he still thought that he couldn't be a hero without his uniform. Still chasing the vultures, and never thought that he could not be able to compete in air combat, which might cause the plane to crash in the city center. And step back ten thousand steps and say that even if the vulture hijacks the plane and steals the weapon, what can he be a small person? It is estimated that he can be sent to prison in a few hours with the method and ability of the reconnection. The potential harm of the whole Spider-Man messing around is actually greater than that of the villain. It is said that with Iron Man behind him, which villain would dare to mess with him in the future, maybe even Aunt Mei was secretly protected. He is no longer Spider-Man, just an Iron Man who shoots spider silk, a superhero without a soul and a skin. Peter Parker doesn't have to be the Spider-Man, whoever takes it is the same.
However, this time Marvel sent a questionnaire to all audiences, which surprised me. This shows that they value the opinions of the audience. However, there are many questions and options in the questionnaire, which shows that movies will pay more and more attention to children’s viewing experience in the future. For example, the first few questions on the first page are whether you take your child to watch the movie? If so, how old is your child? Do you think your child is suitable for watching? Is it too violent? There are also noteworthy question options on the second page. For example, what do you like best about Thor 3? The first two options in the first column are action fighting scenes and humor. The first two options in the second column are the relationship between Sol and Rocky, and the relationship between Sol and Hulk (note that it’s not Sol, Rocky, Hulk these heroes themselves). The remaining options are music, teamwork of heroes, seeing Doctor Strange, overall story, sci-fi fantasy elements, many different scenes, Hela villain and ending. It can be seen that the focus of MCU has turned the cart before the horse. It’s not that this is wrong, nor that it’s the elementary school students who watch Marvel, but it does make this kind of fun and funny because of taking care of young children. The endless interaction between heroes is getting deeper and deeper. Ignore the characters and the story itself. In fact, my view of Disney is quite contradictory. After all, its cartoons brought me a lot of joy when I was young, and Zootopia is my favorite animated film. But it is a pity that MCU gave up the pursuit of plot quality and labelled superheroes as funny fights.
View more about Thor: Ragnarok reviews
