I don't understand why I can't even get 7 points, just because of the length of the film? Is it a problem with the film if you don’t have the patience to watch it?
I have seen a lot of multi-line narrative films so far, and the director played a lot of fancy, but the only thing that impressed me was "The Tower of Babel". Today, I remember the shock of the last time I watched "The Tower of Babel". Gerich, Quentin, and even Inaritu are far behind this one in detail. Although I don’t like "Crash" very much, I always feel that metaphor has overwhelmed human nature, but the author of this film is personally based. The content of the movie looks a lot more comfortable. Two and a half hours is not enough. The three cities and three lines are very similar. The relationship and dilemma of the characters are all more concise to serve the theme, in terms of color, city, and setting. Distinguish the rhythm of the three lines, make the grumpy waiter and painter in New York make the second novel, guilt and deceive the child, escape from reality, make the gypsy girl and the designer make the third one, confess for the son 120 days ago, Then he made unconditional atonement and devoted everything for the sake of another child, but these are the author’s own thoughts, and he did not change for others, so the Roman thread strung the whole film to explain the cause of the son and the effect of the wife. As for the influence of the existence of the third party, even the reasons for the other two lines are explained. The three lines are similar in length, but in fact they are still one main body and two pairs. This kind of close-to-subject and richly connected relationship is really liked. The first two shots, Watch me and his wife swimming both echo, which symbolizes the real hero and heroine of the whole film. In this relationship, Xiaosan plays a variety of roles, such as lover, ex-husband’s girlfriend, gypsy’s liar partner, and alternates between good and evil. Therefore, the initiative and passiveness of writers and lovers have been changing, but they are all excuses given to themselves by the writer, that is, in the end, the writer confronts his wife directly.
The camera is also very good, the teacher only focuses on the scene where the waiter finds his ex-husband to meet his son, and gives an evaluation of “if you can see through this scene, you know how to film”, and progressively express the characters in the scene of the conversation between the two Relationship, drag and girlfriend reaction and son reaction when dragging the ex-wife out, the three lines of expression are all extremely good, I can only say that I have to look more at it.
As the second feature film released by Mr. Xu, the script is indeed very worth learning. The film is also personally liked, and it is enough to change my view of Haggis
View more about Third Person reviews
