This is a real superman. He will be confused, doubt himself, and get angry and revenge. He can't protect everyone. He can't avoid destruction. He can't be perfect, because no matter how "super" he is, he is just a person.
But this is the kind of person who, in the face of many obstacles, slanders and doubts, always insists on helping others and insisting on his kind heart.
It has nothing to do with Krypton or the earth, race identity, or ability. It is the heart of man that defines a hero.
Many so-called "illogical" points do not exist at all
Take "Watching Daddy Die" as an example. Father knew that Clark came to the earth for a reason. He didn't know what it was, but he knew that the world was not ready to accept a superman. He didn't want his son to be suspected, suspected, or exploited. So insist on not letting him show his abilities, even if he is in danger of his life, he will not let Clark save himself. If he does not experience this kind of paternal love positively, instead, he says that "seeing father's death" is a bug? Still have the face that the director is not prepared enough and can't tell stories?
So why does Ronan stand stupidly when Xingjue is dancing? Why did Casillas stand stupidly when his kidney deficiency was dragged in place by the cloak? BOSS takes advantage of the protagonist to do more things on the show, and the whole drama can be ended directly. No one bites any of these bugs?
In Silver Guard 1, Yongdu is the image of a mercenary. Does the second inexplicable play with father's love lay the foundation? Kamora and Nebula fought each other with fate and machine guns in the last second, and the next second they became bitter sisters, no one bites a bitch?
Many "film critics" now have their own "filters" when evaluating comic movies, which is the so-called double standard.
For the light-hearted and humorous movies featuring Marvel, various plot settings can be understood and accepted.
When dealing with DCEU movies, I started to kill my life more seriously, and I had to go against the point of the movie to express. If there is no black point, create a black point, but also black.
Whenever you read a story, you must try to integrate into the story and feel your emotions. Nowadays, many people just want the story to accommodate themselves. If the lengthy, depressing and gloomy things make them uncomfortable, they will swear casually.
While rejecting the protracted narrative, while rejecting the exaggeration of the action drama? Obviously to set off a serious atmosphere, the picture is too dark or is it a shortcoming? Instead of finding a reasonable explanation for the parts of the work that are not straightforward, but deliberately speaking in a clearly unreasonable direction? What is the difference between this and malicious speculation slander?
Is it wrong to be different from the perfect superman "in your impression"? When did the purpose of making a movie change from narrative to pleasing the audience?
Tells the practical meaning but failed to delight the audience, so it was relegated to a low-scoring film. This is the current film review.
If you like it, just click it if it's useless
View more about Man of Steel reviews
