At first I wore the disguise of a stupid actress, and you held the contempt of a male literary director. At the end, I showed the s card, you can't help yourself, exposing m's desire. The shrewd trap makes you fall unconsciously, which is what you call the unpredictable moment. In the process, I will increase the code layer by layer and test your bottom line step by step. Begin to soften your heart with tears, then use coquetry to kill your temper, pause and quarrel in moderation, inadvertently reveal your secrets, and then use acting to divert your attention.
As the actress said, the director’s arguing that this scene is just a discussion of intimacy is just to cover up, and it is basically the director’s inner disdain for women. Class and male power, all of which are owned by the director, so he also refuses to discuss (rejecting others to invade his own upper-class male power). Polanski himself is also such a contradiction. On the one hand, he plays with the world and on the other hand he desires to be conquered. Together, the two can balance the inner anxiety. I have to say that this script has a deep understanding of the power relationship between the sexes. Women always want to conquer men, and men always stay where they are. Once the Pandora's Box is opened, God's punishment for a man is to hand him over to a woman. By the way, I think God's punishment for a woman is to make her a woman. As to whether Polanski himself is good or bad, we have no way of knowing. But this movie shows that Polanski's important reason for women's fate is his extremely shrewd and honest. Yes, of course he is sincere, but he will also use his natural acting skills to cunningly show his charming side. In the final analysis, to conquer such self-proclaimed literary youth is basically a loss-making business. It is acceptable for ordinary people to perform such a play, but it is difficult to perform such s and m dramas every day. If you have to try it, watch this movie first.
View more about Venus in Fur reviews
