Both the photography style and the soundtrack take a beautiful and deep route, which makes people look forward to the plot very much. It seems to have a grand theme, profound philosophy, and endless inside story for people to explore, but the content is very low and young. I still thought at the beginning. There should be a reversal. The traitor in homeland security must be behind the scenes, right? McCoff must have kept it deep, right? result……
First of all, the black second generation is too stupid, right? Two subordinates, if you want to kill, kill them together, kill one and leave the other clearly to continue killing, isn't it forcing people to rebel? I gave the same gun both times. Is this for fear that others will not be wary of it? Money laundering butlers are also lucky, just find someone to pass a USB flash drive, and the male protagonist also finds someone at the airport to give it to him. Isn't he afraid of encountering a corrupt alliance? It turned out to be very lucky, and I just ran into an enemy. This kind of plot that involves ordinary people in an incident generally has to be so in a certain emergency situation to make it reasonable.
The money laundering black butler is also doing it. Since I plan to inform, at least I can give a sufficient "deposit", right? Ensuring follow-up safety must have enough "bargaining chips", and the result must be seen on the spot. If you don't see it, tell others as soon as possible, it is simply urging others to start quickly.
Hidden in the city, hiding in a sparsely populated place is just convenient for people to kill, but also with a mobile phone, even if the silly daughter doesn't make a call or even turns on the phone, it can be tracked, right? It seems that Le Carré can't keep up with modern technology a bit, and it is more suitable for writing spy films from the 1960s. In the end, only three killers were sent, and one of them was undressed to force a man. He could have a shot, but he had to go shirtless. Isn't this kind of routine too old?
The helicopter crash is also too strange. It should be betrayed by a homeland security traitor. I originally thought: awesome! Sure enough, it's reversed! The righteous and solemn speech at the meeting turned out not to be in the same way, and to participate in the sharing of the spoils. However, I think too much...
When you don’t pass the small note, you don’t pass it until you die. This is called death! For the money laundering steward, the safest way is to expose all corrupt accounts as soon as possible. As long as the media or the Internet is exposed, it will be meaningless to kill him.
Finally, the paper in the gun chamber will pop up by itself. What is the principle?
View more about Our Kind of Traitor reviews
