The hard and fast rules for handing in homework
As one of the few war movies I watched, I actually have a faint feeling of admiration for this category of movies. After all, the current peace is exchanged for the blood and tears of the predecessors. However, due to the fact that I have a weak endurance of the R-class in my heart, I rarely choose to watch blockbuster movies on this subject unless it is necessary.
Probably I was spoiled in advance. This was a great discount to my sense of watching the movie. I finally couldn't stand the movie that I watched directly at 1.5 times (sorry to the director, screenwriter, actor and all the staff who worked hard for this film) but completely It does not affect the overall structure of the story and the progress of the lines, which makes my impression of this film slightly down.
This film compares with the war-themed masterpieces like "Blood Battle at Hacksaw Ridge", "Dunkirk", and "Private Ryan" that I watched before. The main siege of this story is really very ordinary. Because it involves real historical adaptations, storytelling is actually difficult for screenwriters to make breakthroughs, but I personally think that editing and filming and directors are really good at portraying story characters. Throughout the story, there is only the character of the poster hero. The image has gained a firmer foothold, and other soldiers, politicians, and politicians are all over-faced. Such a simple and straightforward description, the originally very legendary historical story is not at all unpleasant to read.
This was a very delicate point during the Cold War. The Congolese coup was in a state of twisting due to the push of American and Soviet politicians. The story lines of several key characters involved in the event are very rough, interspersed and very superficial, almost fighting for the siege of the city. All the soldiers under the male protagonist Quinlan really played the role of silly Baitian. Except for the inexplicable and efficient encirclement, the whole movie is like this company of people collectively opening up, with hundreds of shots, almost zero mistakes in all decisions, and the usual silly big hat. On the battlefield, he immediately changed his face and changed his face. I know that the director is trying to express that no one is born as a killing machine. They also have flesh and blood and naive fantasies, but the character's emotional transformation is really flawed, and the audience is completely baffled.
There is no multi-dimensional characterization of General Tshombo who is really bad and bad. The French mercenaries are also very inexplicable. Every time I retreat, I beat my chest and my feet, so I can’t help but grab the mercenaries and rush forward. Can you give more plot changes to the heroes? ! ! In addition, the beautiful blonde widow did not even explain it in conjunction with the plot. A beautiful male protagonist’s wife is a perfect and gentle wife of a straight male with cancer. I hope you encourage and encourage me. I hope you’ll wait. If you don’t say a word, you will just let go on the battlefield if you don’t want you to leave. OMG~
This probably wants to express the story of the siege of war heroes who persevere in the battlefield, indomitable, always have an IQ online belief, and finally, no death, all members go home hand in hand~
OVER~
View more about The Siege of Jadotville reviews
