I finally finished watching the movie that I have collected for a long time tonight. At first I thought the content of the movie was very funny, but at the end, I was shocked at first, and then several questions lingered in my heart. After reading it back and forth several times, I finally tried to break my head and didn’t come up with an answer that would convince myself. Perhaps this film was originally intended to convey such a thought. Many detective novels, even the author, can explain whatever they want. There is no solution.
First of all, let’s start from the end. Even the reasoning at the end is a common bridge. First, mistakenly identify a murderer, you will feel that the detective is right, and then with more inside stories, the murderer will constantly change. Then, in your opinion, each of them makes sense, and it is precisely because of this that after everyone has reasoned, the instigator will agree and make a gesture of wanting to give a bonus.
Level 1: Conclusion [The butler is the murderer] The reasoner [The Detective of the King of China] Reasons for the reasoning [The butler is the murderer]
Level 2: Conclusion [Lawyer is the murderer] Reasoner [Miss Marble who is not Miss Marple] Reason for reasoning [Twine’s body was found in the lawyer’s house]
Level 3: Conclusion [Accounting is the murderer] Reasoning person [Didi] Reasons for reasoning [The housekeeper was still holding the bill when he died, everything here is outsourced, and only the accountant will do this]
4th floor: Conclusion [Daughter is a murderer] Reasoner [Unreasonable version of Poirot] Reasons for reasoning [I smelled Chanel No. 5 on you while eating] (I thought the whole film was a Chanel commercial)
5th floor: Conclusion [One of the detectives is a murderer] Reasoning person [American gay detective who thief shouts to catch the thief] Reasons for reasoning [I want to sell my teammates but I did not expect to be killed]
In this regard, the author’s comment was "Either you write some unexpected but completely unreasonable reasoning; or the book is almost finished before introducing a new character and telling us that this is the murderer; and you? All valid clues are hidden and not shown to readers at all."
So what are the facts? I think the detectives' reasoning may not be correct, but the information they collected is true. So Mr. Twine died a few years ago , and this game was set by his daughter, the woman who pretended to be a cook. It was her who wrote the letter at the beginning, because at the beginning of the letter, her fingernails were very delicate, and the person who wrote the letter had a little finger and her voice was also a woman, and the butler did so without any doubt, indicating that the butler was aware of it, and only the two of them The butler does not have to pretend to be blind, so the butler is really blind . Later, Mr. Twine who appeared in front of everyone was also pretending to be. When others asked her how she looked so young, she said that she would go to bed early and eat vegetarian cosmetics, and her posture was very charming. The plot advances. When the chef enters the dining room to notify the housekeeper that he is dead, in the subsequent scenes, the chef is always there, including when "Mr. Twine" talks with the detectives through the deer head on the wall, so our big boss There should be other helpers . The butler did not die, because the queen said that the butler's body was plastic, and they kept holding the handkerchief when they first checked the body. The booked deceased Twine was also a person who died many years ago, so I think no one was actually killed in the whole incident , just to tease a round of these detectives, so I waited for the detectives to return to the right trap behind the room. It seems so dangerous, but no one is really hurt.
View more about Murder by Death reviews
