Regarding money, Mr. Roman never said that he pretended to be noble and said that he did not need money, his partner fell ill, and the law firm was looking for a new way out. The first thing he mentioned was his own maintenance of life. He went to a human rights organization to find a job. In addition to preaching the truth, in addition to providing the other party with a resume of his past victories, he also insisted on a salary. Therefore, Mr. Roman is not hypocritical.
After Mr. Roman joined the new law firm, he met the beauties of human rights organizations. A new perspective on the weapon of law has been developed. He used to think that the law is a sacred thing. To use the law to transform society, one must follow a sacred process, a sacred ceremony. For example, first draft an amendment, impeccable, and then submit it to the federal review to become a written law. However, the more he came into contact with reality, the more open he became. For example, he has always insisted on giving money to the homeless so that no one will be cremated after they die. But he met a wanderer, snatched his money, and snatched his iPod. So he said, don’t think that what you get is just what you deserve. He defended a man who wanted to expose his accomplices in exchange for legal pardon. He didn't say hello to the law firm to do business with the prosecutor without authorization. As a result, the news leaked, and the real murderer killed his client in the detention center in advance. Roman himself said that any tool is a weapon, depending on how he uses it. There was nothing wrong with his act of divulging the address of the murderer in exchange for money. He wants to punish the evildoer in his own way, and make money by the way. Isn't this a new phenomenon exhibited by the new law firm? The boss of the new law firm told Roman that he was a former student of Roman partners. The way Roman old law firm operates is that he wholesales difficult cases to Roman them, and then collects a certain rebate. It not only solves the problem of social justice, but also feeds justice-loving people like Roman. It was precisely when Roman thought about this issue that he violated professional ethics and revealed the murderer's address to the victim's family.
What's wrong with this?
If you are wrong, it is because the murderer is too ferocious and he will kill two people in a row. It was also wrong that Roman did such a thing for the first time, and didn't hide himself well.
He died as a result. His death was actually an accident.
View more about Roman J. Israel, Esq. reviews
