The chain of evidence in this case is very loose, and there is basically no logical connection between the evidence and the testimony. They looked for a technical witness, put an advertisement on the Internet, and found a neurotic former technical employee born. The two fishermen who filmed the video were framed for possession of drugs. They almost automatically came out to testify without doing much work. It seems that he is not too worried about being killed by the born company. These side plots eventually disappeared. For example, were the two fishermen finally released? Did the hero help them clean up their grievances? People were framed by others because they were helping you testify. You should be obligated to help them do something, right? There is also that beautiful female secretary. For him to use her body to exchange information with the police, I quite sympathize with her. There was also Rachel, the customer who had been fucked by him the first time he met, and was soon silenced inexplicably.
Cooperman finally had a stroke, which was a turning point, changing the rhythm of comedy in one minute.
So to summarize, how did the lawsuit win? no fucking clue! Under the premise that all the exhibits and witnesses were refuted, the jury finally short-circuited the brain to help the male protagonist win the lawsuit. I asked you if you are afraid of such a brain hole?
View more about Goliath reviews
