If you don’t understand, kill a male lead and another will come out.
Because to define a person is to deny a person.
It's the assassination of personality. It is laziness in thinking. It's the evil of mediocrity.
What the male protagonist wants to express, in my opinion, is a kind of "enthusiasm" that is constantly disappearing.
This "enthusiasm" is manifested in the power of youth. It is manifested in the spirit of recklessness, manifested in masculine and emotional.
In contrast, the whole world is constantly moving towards rationalization.
Globalized commerce and the excavation of female consumption trends will circulate stocks from a corner of the world to China, the United States, Europe, South Africa, and any continent. What a good business, so many win-wins, more and more people are earning money to survive, what's wrong with rationality?
How many things did the Jews invent to threaten the world?
You can say that the Jews Einstein and Freud plunged everything into chaos. But can you prove that it is chaos? At least people now believe that the theory of relativity, quantum physics, and psychology are a kind of reality, and they can be applied to large or microscopic principles of reality, representing a kind of innate rationality of the Jewish nation.
And whether this rationality is truly correct, and whether it will still be appreciated by future children and grandchildren a hundred years later, I really don’t know.
At least in the terrorist concentration camps of World War II, the Jewish people can keep their eyes open, watching their children being killed, and even close their eyes and cry in cooperation, without doing anything. Because if you do something, the child will die, and he will die too. The situation where both people die is the worst in probability.
1+1=2, it's such simple mathematics. The Jews accepted people, but the Aryans did not.
The male protagonist scolded this kind of "don't do it." He hates feminization and reason. He would rather die together than live. He wants to kill the enemy. He doesn't believe in mathematics. Fanaticism can conceal this mathematics.
An inaccurate statement in the advanced civilized world is that everyone is becoming feminine, and everyone is becoming rational. Except for Muslims, maybe they are still male and emotional.
What the male protagonist wants is the strength of youth, the strength of enthusiasm. However, this power has been continuously reduced along with female-oriented consumption and capital buying and selling. Now, Europe has become a country with negative population growth, and the power of youth is no longer seen. On this point, you can look at Yuval Harari.
I am not saying that everyone should have the Nazi spirit to maintain the masculine part. I think rationality is simply a good thing. I hope everyone can have rationality. But if you don’t understand this so-called “enthusiasm” spirit, the violent forces that are struggling in this society will probably always exist, and they will hurt the rational but innocent people in this society.
Enthusiastic young people are resisting, but they can't resist. They thought that what they were rebelling against was Jewish power, but in fact it was no longer Jewish power and culture.
This world is not influenced by the vagrant Jewish culture, but because the world has the power of reason and the spirit possessed by the Jews, this kind of culture has been globalized on a large scale and has been developing to this day.
It is not moral to just push to the Jews. The Jews are just an introduction. It is the trend of rational development in the world today, which frustrates many people who still maintain a full of sentiment and enthusiasm.
Enthusiasm can't be exchanged for food, enthusiasm can't find a job. People who can find a job are “feminine” people who buy and sell rationally, calculate benefits, and add to their resumes.
The world is not yet rational enough to understand these "enthusiastic" people. We will only isolate them, marginalize them, and then continue to push them to break the law, and then perish themselves.
Then we added a sentence of "little cricket", which deserved it.
But is this reasonable? Are we right?
They just chose the opposite of the trend. What's more, we have no idea whether this rational trend is absolutely correct.
Nowadays, many scholars are still reflecting on whether excessive consumption destroys human nature and whether they are removing people from society.
What about automation? What about artificial intelligence? We kick people off the job step by step, and even split the family. If we are rationally certain that this is inevitable, close our eyes like a Jew in a concentration camp and watch the child die, is this correct? Is this in line with human nature?
I have no idea. Perhaps our resistance will only destroy us more deeply, perhaps automation is the more correct choice, and rationality is right... But when there are two possible correct solutions, how should we choose?
Don't let yourself stop thinking, even if the end result is self-defeating like this kid.
People are born with the power to be emotional when they are young. If he chooses this passionate and masculine way of living, it will be totally alien to me. Should he die in order to maintain social stability?
So what's the difference between us and Hitler forming an army to kill the Jews?
At that time, there was a zealous attempt to kill reason, but now the power of reason around the world is ready to kill Muslims and some Nazis? This kind of killing is almost meaningless. The reality is that both sides choose not to understand each other, and both sides choose not to treat each other as human beings.
If Jews have brought instability to the world, and Einstein and Freud have brought uncertainty, then this uncertainty may be what we need.
We need uncertainty, we need the affirmative chaos of psychology, and we need the atomic bomb. The atomic bomb not only brought the possibility of destroying mankind, but also brought peace and rationality on a large scale throughout the world.
We also need uncertainty to remain soft and understand. We are not sure that the current world development trend is correct. Let this uncertainty leave some room for enthusiasm and reason.
View more about The Believer reviews
