No, 10 years ago, have you ever thought that our smart mobile terminals are changing our lives so quickly and deeply today?
I have to say that the realization of ordinary robots in the play is almost irreversible. However, letting robots have self-awareness, emotions and emotions actually involves human nature and philosophy. These make us re-examine what we are.
Today's human morality and compassion are based on a series of values established by people themselves. Human rights should be protected. Robots have no rights as property, but when they have consciousness and emotions?
However, it must be mentioned that as animals with emotion and consciousness, their rights and interests are still not guaranteed. This seems to verify that the top of the food chain only has the meaning of game decision-making power. In this way, the morality of human nature is actually hypocritical and conditional.
It is mentioned in the play that the consciousness possessed by the synthetic humans with human consciousness is a set of program codes. I don't know much about programming, but human emotions and personalities are ever-changing, and are affected by genetics, folklore, religion, and growth experience. How powerful is the code to simulate such powerful and boundless situations and changes.
I have always believed that humans are composed of two parts: body and soul. The soul is an unknowable substance, perhaps an electromagnetic wave, or perhaps a kind of energy. It will not disintegrate with the death of the body. After being separated from the body, it may exist in another dimension with us in another form. So I guess that a truly conscious robot should be a combination of a body and this electromagnetic energy, not a code.
However, there is another limitation here, because human consciousness and emotions change with the changes of the external body. He is born with a family of the same blood. The experience of growing up and the imprint of the times deeply affect a person’s personality. And values. These are things that are not available to robots that have no social connection and are always static, unless each robot replicates the consciousness of a real human.
LEO has more bugs, half human and half machine. It is difficult to understand from the current human thinking, how to make the flesh and blood coexist with the machine, not to mention the body's own immune rejection function, how the body's nutrition and normal metabolism are realized. If this problem is solved, I think humans should not need low-end robots to serve themselves. Humans can implant all kinds of smart devices, and then everyone will live as if they are on the hook.
In general, the ultimate development of science and technology comes down to the choice of human nature. Just as ordinary humans in the play began to protest against the existence of synthetic humans, Mattie told Laura pessimistically that it takes seven years for her to work hard to become a qualified doctor, and it only takes seven minutes to transfer those medical knowledge to the robot's brain. So, why bother to work hard. Both Laura and the Detective felt that robots replaced their family roles. People's sense of value, existence and the reasons for working hard and motivated are lost.
In fact, the human brain is not as smart as we think to distinguish between the real and the fake. Even knowing that it is just a machine, the people in the play will inevitably treat them as humans. In fact, we have done this today. Watching movies and TV shows gives us spiritual enjoyment. We can’t help but indulge in the joy and sadness of the plot. Don’t we know that those are actors, but we still believe that those who
like to play games may be even more Understand this. The development of virtual reality technology in the future will make games more immersive. So in the future world, does it matter whether the robot is a real person or a fake person? Is the boundary between what is true and what is false in the world we exist still clear, so will our laws, our moral rules and boundaries follow? Vague.
Let's talk about the plot. In fact, except for the implantation of the concept of artificial intelligence, the whole drama is still relatively normal and slightly old-fashioned. The decent and the villain are quite distinct and slightly changed, the warm human family, friendship and love. There are also stories about the change of the consciousness connection of six synthetic humans. It has to remind me of the story of the dragon ball summoning the dragon.
LEO, a little stubborn little handsome guy, MIYA, a kind and affectionate sister, Niska, a super blonde and seductive beauty, a hot temper and a good temper. Mattie, the inexplicable academic bully. In the plot, I feel that the Laura family's attitude towards synthetics is a bit abrupt, and there is not much emotional foreshadowing, and it suddenly becomes a life-and-death relationship. The stalk that Laura killed his brother Tom is a bit weak. It doesn't think it is a major event that can affect family relationships, and it is not enough to constitute a fundamental factor in trusting a synthetic person. Other than that, it's okay. Looking forward to the next season.
View more about Humans reviews
