Scourge

Roxanne 2022-01-11 08:01:40

This is a documentary about the Indonesian gang leader who killed countless people in the anti-China and anti-communist movement. Although he has not been punished by law so far, he cannot escape the mental torture. The characters in the movie are all those who personally slaughtered communists and persecuted Chinese. Now they are old.

Dig a little bit, this is a film about seeking soul salvation after a serious sin. It was revealed in the movie that he tried to seek relief by pretending to be gods and ghosts, through religious activities, paralyzing nerves through drug use, socializing through dancing, educating young people through television, and demonizing communists and Chinese to seek liberation. After all, agreeing to make a movie to give young people an explanation may be one of them. It's a pity that there can only be temporary happiness, and all these efforts come to the end. When the night comes, he has nightmares again and again. In the end, he couldn't hide his torture in front of the camera. Fortunately, there was the scene where he couldn't help himself at the end of the movie. Even so, he can only feel that he deserved it. It will not be heaven waiting for him.

If the structure of this movie is messy, it doesn't seem to affect the viewing, let alone a person suffering from such a terminal illness, and there is no way to go to the doctor.

After watching this movie, I vaguely feel that it has a deeper meaning. Are they talking about the self-reflection of these gangs, or are they just the product of a larger political background? The film mentioned the violence and Cold War ideology of American films many times, which had a bad influence on Indonesian youths at that time. One of the reasons why the gang decided to persecute the communists was because they could get income from the American movie box office, and the communists opposed the introduction of American movies. The girlfriend of one of the gangsters was Chinese, but he was too ruthless Chinese, so when he saw a Chinese cut one, he didn't even let his girlfriend's father let go.

In the film, they asked repeatedly that in order to make excuses for their killings, they found various reasons. It is said that the communists were cruel and thought of this as a war rather than a simple gang killing. But are they cruel to us? Several people are thinking about anti-corruption, and after deliberation, they still feel that the communists must not be cruel by themselves. What they wanted to do back then was: turn the gangsters in American movies into their real life. They learned the methods of murder in movies and dressed like the United States. The clothes of the gangster will only be more cruel than in the movie.

It seems that this movie is looking at the United States. These people who continue to claim that they are pursuing freedom and opposing communism turn out to be said: Indonesia is over-democratic and not as stable as it was during the military government. Why does it seem that when I watch it, I feel that this movie is not only about the United States? Are there any rare stories in the world that regard dissidents as enemies and slash at others with youthful blood? Take a look at the time of the incident described in the movie: 1966... ​​it was another fever worldwide.

Who made this film? Once I found the country of origin, there was no suspense: Europe. Check the director again. He is actually an American, but he lives in Denmark and graduated from Harvard University. The film has won multiple awards in Europe, but not in the United States.

View more about The Act of Killing reviews

Extended Reading
  • Neva 2022-04-24 07:01:17

    Found guilty isn't the destiny of a murder who believed in things called "free man".

  • Mortimer 2022-04-23 07:03:36

    Evil and ugliness were manifested through the official massacre in Indonesia in the 20th century and the gangs that took the opportunity to take advantage of it. Many viewers couldn't help projecting the country's history. The performance (a naive imitation of Hollywood in the 1960s) makes the process of empathy protracted, and the final twist is slightly hypocritical - maybe we all expect evil to be so simple and obvious, and education to be so easy.

The Act of Killing quotes

  • Adi Zulkadry - Fellow Executioner in 1965: We crushed their necks with wood. We hung them. We strangled them with wire. We cut off their heads. We ran them over with cars. We were allowed to do it. And, the proof is we murdered people and were never punished. The people we killed, there's nothing to be done about it. They have to accept it. Maybe I'm just trying to make myself feel better, but it works: I've never felt guilty, never been depressed, never had nightmares.

  • Anwar Congo: Did the people I tortured feel the way I do here? I can feel what the people I tortured felt. Because here my dignity has been destroyed, and then fear come, right there and then. All the terror suddenly possessed my body. It surrounded me, and possessed me.

    Joshua Oppenheimer: Actually, the people you tortured felt far worse, because you knew it's only a film. They knew they were being killed.

    Anwar Congo: But I can feel it, Josh. Really, I feel it. Or have I sinned. I did this to so many people, Josh. Is it all coming back to me? I really hope it won't. I don't want it to, Josh.