A few basic logic errors

Eliane 2022-01-10 08:01:48

1. The robot has developed to a level consistent with real people. Unfortunately, the development of other fields has not achieved any results. Then according to the development law of human science, robots should do everything instead of being limited to servants. Just like the iPhone, all smart tools can be attached to the ride. Office tools can become portable furniture (when you get tired when you go to a place without seats, you can temporarily use them as chairs or beds.), cameras, tape recorders, and shopping systems. But this drama actually only regards such a high-tech, such low-energy-consumption robot as a housekeeper, which does not conform to the logic of technological development.
2. Efficiency ratio. A robot can work for a whole day after charging for a few hours in the play. This efficiency ratio is quite high, so what else do we have to do with other low-efficiency tools. Cell phones, laptops, even wired phones, cars. Just like with computers, few people use the post office, and with mobile phones, fewer and fewer people use computers. The robot can run, we can ride on it, no car is needed. Would you ask someone to fly a plane to pull a car?
3. The contradiction is puzzling. According to the deconstruction of the human brain, one of the basic characteristics of human thinking is to reduce complexity to simplicity. The human brain even does not hesitate to create illusions to achieve this goal. That is to save trouble. This is why technology has made us more and more convenient. Now that there is a full-scale use of robots, according to the description in the series, it is not a new thing that only one or two companies have, but application life for many, many years, so that according to the male owner, it is "cheaper than buying a car"! Some people will say that I don't want such low-cost mass-produced technology products! I want to find my presence. The invention of the mobile phone did not see any postman committed suicide. Because the postman can sit in the office and stay with the air conditioner on.
4. Sexual use of robots. This is extremely far-fetched in this play. First of all, without mentioning the difficulties of physical design, it is only in the current virtual images that it takes a lot of cost to make the virtual characters have sexual characteristics and do not need to express the sexual characteristics of the characters, especially for female characters. Computers have to perform a lot of redundant calculations, and all of this is considered in computer games as "unless you really need it, it’s best not to do it." Now in this drama, the sexual characteristics of the robots are extremely obvious. They are all handsome men and beautiful women, and the cost is so low that they have not been mass-produced until now, and they are all designed individually. So, why are there brothels? It's as if you have a game console in your house, why do you go to the game hall to do it? If you want to change your taste, you can rent and borrow from each other. What do you want your wife and husband to do? How come there are children?
5.
The basic problem of cost accounting is now ready to emerge.
First of all, robots should have price differences. This is the basic principle of capitalism: differentiation. Only by establishing differentiation can greater benefits be obtained. If robots have really reached such a low cost as stated in the series, then why do humans maintain capitalism? Humans no longer need to work. (Like "Ghost in the Shell") In addition to staying is to destroy the robot for fun (like "ai").
Secondly, according to the principle of making the best use of everything, a robot hardware can definitely be replaced with an operating system at will, then people inside The emotions of a robot are ridiculous, because it is possible to copy all the information of a robot to another robot. The soul transfer is achieved (same as "Chapai"). Isn’t it ridiculous that you are thinking about a certain robot? It reminds me of a joke, "Mom is holding on to the unlit monitor and crying, all the data in my QQ space is gone." Isn't this a truth that geek can understand? Does a science fiction film not even understand such basic computer knowledge?
Also, humans do not need to respond so much to robot awakening. The human brain determines that humans are a naturally lazy race. We just don’t bother to think about anything other than eating and sleeping if no one is disturbed for a day. If we only think about how to achieve our purpose in a simpler way. If robots suddenly awakened like "ai" and "Chapai", human beings, judging from the history of tens of thousands of years in which they feel good about themselves, will inevitably jump up happily and declare that they are God. All humans treat robots as their own children, but given that we also treat our children in many different ways, such as rape, beating, torturing, selling or even eating...so it should be modified to make most humans happy.
Finally, whether robots can replace humans can be seen from the fact that humans want to develop the intelligence of chimpanzees like crazy: how much humans desire to have another self-aware species appear. Human beings are an extremely lonely group. We live in remote galaxies. We have not visited by aliens for so many years. As a result, our evaluation of ourselves is always too high, so that we all believe that the rapid development of science and technology will harm us. We are still Is it just a primitive race? We still have many incurable diseases. We still don’t have the ability to manned high-speed space flight, we still don’t have the ability to rebuild organs, we still can’t wipe out the hunger of the whole people, and we still can’t consume and recycle as a whole. We still use needles to inject! If a robot can really become "Friday", then what humans think is not whether she or he will take my place, but how can he or she replace themselves more quickly.
In addition, the idea that an advanced species will enslave humans once it rises is really a humanistic theory. In this film, the robot is enslaved, despised, discarded, and kidnapped. What people think is, if he or she robs my job, what can I do? When cars first appeared, many coachmen once smashed cars, saying that technology had replaced their jobs, but that was only because they didn't know how to use cars. When mobile phones replaced wired phones, no one jumped out to throw mobile phones, because fools would use them. This is human beings. The focus is not on technology, but on how to be lazier.

View more about Humans reviews

Related Articles