Call it a bad movie, right? It seems a bit harsh, and there is no perfunctory attitude from the production and the performance of the actors; call it a good film, right? Obviously, it is a thousand miles away. It is boring, unintelligible, and has a lot of grooves. There is no bright spot from the creativity to the plot.
Throughout the whole movie, the biggest mistake or failure of the director is that he failed to find a suitable position and purpose from beginning to end, so that the audience was confused. First of all, the introduction of the concept of "zombies" into science fiction movies is a bit vulgar, but it is not a must. However, the problem is that the director's style and the language of multiple shots are clearly a "literary and artistic" rhythm; secondly, since it is necessary To play "literary and artistic", one should have a "literary and artistic" accent. In recent years, there are actually many science fiction films that have followed the "literary and artistic" line, such as "Host", "Landscape of Lost Wars" and so on. The former emphasizes the individual will. The latter contains the concept of environmental protection, and both have good intentions and themes. But looking at "The Last Days on Mars", I don't know what the director wants to express. Is it the hard work of scientific researchers? ? What is even more ridiculous is that this story has a relationship with Mars? Where can I tell that Mars is necessary? Many unique features of Mars have not been used, which is really helpless.
It seems that compared to his wife Naomi Woz, Levi Schreiber's vision of the selection of the film is not even a little bit worse!
View more about The Last Days on Mars reviews
