Westerners who made documentary films were also Westerners who instigated and supported military coups. Their original intention may not be massacre, but all this is inevitable. When the executioners talked about American gangsters or spy war movies, such as "The Godfather" and "007", they have a strong sense of substitution, even a sense of superiority. I have really killed people, they are no actors. You like to watch slaughter, we can shoot better because we have experienced it.
This is to let gangsters watch movies, they can only see blood and carnage, and nothing else.
It seems to be the result of the penetration of Western values, but it is not. This kind of clumsy imitation is like a deformed freak. People can't guess why they grow up like this. They want to stifle them but they are not allowed.
In order to reinterpret the scenes of the massacre in the past, they persuaded the common people to be extras, pushed the old man, and clamored to burn your house. The old man's grandson hugged his grandfather tightly, and they could see that there was real panic in their eyes. , Not the superb acting skills. What's more sad is that the crowds onlookers are like passers-by in any historical event, clapping their hands happily, not knowing who they are cheering for.
Every time they demonstrate how to kill people, I am afraid that they will do a fake show.
Seeing them enthusiastically preparing to make a movie, I thought that maybe they are pure, pure to ignorant, ignorant to terrible, thinking that such a thing will be filmed and everyone will like to watch it.
The executioner named Adi is considered a thinking person. Many of the things he said may represent the psychology of those who have a certain knowledge background.
"In order not to make myself feel guilty, I have to find a legitimate reason for killing."
"The Communist Party is not as cruel as we are."
"You have nightmares because your will is not firm enough."
But such a person. Even if he said such words, he wouldn't have the slightest guilt for his indiscriminate killing of innocent people, especially when it comes to killing Chinese. Such people, as the shooting progresses, feel that if the documentary is successful, it will cause a 360-degree reversal of the government's image and history. It is this kind of person who has not been condemned by his conscience, nor is he tortured by nightmares night after night.
A survivor, the so-called descendant of the Communist Party, is like telling a joke, jokingly portraying his father who was hacked to death in the massacre. Such a person seems even more terrifying. But maybe he said this so that the executioners would not feel criticized after listening. A way of survival.
Newspaper reporters who tried to distinguish themselves from the incident were despised by the butchers, demonstrating that they never concealed what they had done. In this regard, it seems to be stronger than a certain ethnic group.
The hooligan who was running for Congress looked at himself in the mirror, listened to Obama's speech, and sorted out his expressions and appearances. Even if such a rascal has not yet become a civil servant, he begins to figure out how to get money from everyone's pocket. The so-called bandit with a tie.
In a word, I have never liked this country ever since.
At the beginning of the film, Anwar took the director to the massacre location, relaxed and with a little bragging tone to talk about his past, resetting his way of killing, and at the end of the film, he dragged his heavy body and opened it blankly. With both eyes, he asked if his behavior was a crime, and then he held on to the wall and kept retching. . .
View more about The Act of Killing reviews
