Do you feel panic, I'm serious.
Although our lives now benefit from the advancement of technology.
The popularity of computers as a media, otherwise I would not talk nonsense here.
Mechanized mass production can provide more food to meet human feeding needs.
However, I see cars and motorcycles that can be quickly manufactured and quickly destroyed. It even exists to lay eggs and be slaughtered, as well as milk-producing livestock.
I felt panic after a while.
It's not that I am anti-Party, anti-society and anti-technology.
The advancement of technology has benefited me a lot.
The same kind of life also makes people reflect a lot.
But the right to choose is still in our hands.
Hmm, how do you say it?
You can choose to use less computer, communicate more, exercise more, read more or something.
The emptiness of the mind cannot be filled by material and lifestyle changes. To a certain extent, things that are manufactured on a large scale will not change, because there are strict requirements for quality and production processes. The difference is the user.
For example, you can buy a quick meal at will to solve the problem of food and clothing. You can also choose for a long time at the vegetable market, just to make a satisfying dinner for yourself or others.
But this kind of life can't satisfy you, it's rare to be full of kindness every day. We desire more, fast, and effective things, even if we feel greater emptiness afterwards.
If I can look better now, and the cost of the operation is completely affordable, why not? Why do I have to work hard every day not to eat this or that? Once the figure becomes too out of shape, I only need a small operation, right?
I am not here to criticize and expose the shortcomings of technology.
I just want to talk about its impact on me.
First of all, through watching this film, I found that I have not been completely surrounded by technology. I don't know if it is a good thing or a bad thing, but at least I am very satisfied with the current state.
Second, there are still cultures in the world that have not been assimilated by mainstream civilizations.
Finally, technology is the primary productive force, but it is also equivalent to "money drives the further development of technology."
Now speaking of this documentary, the shooting technique is very interesting. First comes out religious culture, then landscape, then technology, and then return to life (first rich, then poor). It mainly shows that if you don't compare, you don't realize how rich or happy you are or how poor and sad you are.
Especially the gun section is particularly interesting. Whether it is the appearance of various characters with guns or the huge national celebration ceremony later, the most ironic thing is the wounded soldier and the group of tombstones in the middle, and I don’t know which country. The coffin in which the black man was buried was actually in the shape of a huge gun.
The advancement of science and technology cannot solve the problem of conflict. It will only magnify it, multiplying the probability of victory and defeat.
The huge wall and the heavily armed border line are just separated, or they redefine a certain way of life, but perhaps so, most people live in the center of a national border.
Your evaluation of something is bad, or your evaluation of something is good. Generally speaking, it is a gray mentality and life state. You can't maintain a good state or a bad state forever. After all, these two words have not been fully defined, they just change with the changes in the country, politics and mainstream culture.
It is like reincarnation. There is no reincarnation. It is just something that has been passed down thousands of years ago. There is no change in belief conflicts, the gap between rich and poor, and resource plunder. It is nothing more than the fact that there are fewer key factors that determine the outcome of war. I used to pay attention to a benevolent, domineering, monarch, benevolent and so on. What are you paying attention to now? Whoever has more weapons of mass destruction, who has greater deterrence, who has a stronger economy, has more power to speak.
What kind of reincarnation is this? It hasn't changed at all.
Finally, talk about the process of destroying the sand painting.
What is ruined can be rebuilt, and then it will be destroyed after it is rebuilt.
So what is it for? Is it for destruction? Then destroy and rebuild?
If the film is about reincarnation, then this is the most essential act of reincarnation.
Because the essence of existence is to wait to be perished, but perish because of existence.
There is nothing that is destroyed without being, and there is nothing that continues to exist without being destroyed.
The desert used to be an oasis, and the peak of prosperity is decline.
that is it.
View more about Samsara reviews
