I don't know whether it is a matter of narrative or translation. The movie seems a little messy. But the main line is clear and exciting. I define it as a "coquettish and suspenseful version of HELP". The film seems to want to express too much. On the one hand, it wants to tell us about the unfair treatment of blacks in the 1960s. On the one hand, they are bold and bold in their sexual performance. On the other hand, they are revealing the contradictions of human nature. Nicole Kidman created a wave of climaxes in two hours, dedicating her most coquettish screen image so far. In the movie, Nicole Kidman is heavily makeup and cynical, but she is firm in the love she wants. She tried to save the man who only had correspondence with her, and met all the sexual needs that the man wanted, and finally ended in sadness. ZAC is as handsome as ever, and the performance that is not enough is not worth mentioning under his flowery appearance. Matthew boldly challenged the roles of different sexual orientations this time. Cusack keeps surprises. In his performance as the so-called villain, it is the key to the opposite of human nature that the film wants to reveal-the planted unoccupied killings and the harm done for selfish desires.
In the movie, ZAC’s panties, NICOLE’s bra, and CUSACK’s naked butt sex scenes, etc., are unabashedly naked dramas. I think they are not just a gimmick, but more to tell the audience that the movie is showing the ugly goodness of human nature at a glance. come out.
Every character in the film appears to be unruly and does not make a clear distinction between good and bad. Such a movie that explores human nature, perhaps the messy process is the closest thing to the real work.
View more about The Paperboy reviews
