A good director, a good actor, and a good photography all put together a film that is half-understood. Although it is a film adapted from a novel, there is not much to create in terms of plot alone, so the director specializes in photography and shooting techniques, which is the only and biggest highlight of this film. It even overwhelmed Dafoe's superb acting skills.
I didn’t talk about the plot, and there was no way to talk about the shooting method. I had to talk about a few scenes about hunting wild animals in the film. Regardless of whether these scenes are true or false, it is a great fortunate that the wildlife protection organization did not find the trouble of the main creator. Up.
In fact, it is really not recommended for people who intend to look for traces of Hollywood in this film. You will not see anything, and after watching it, you will yell that this film is rubbish and waste your time.
At least, the beauty is eye-catching, isn't it?
There is nothing here.
View more about The Hunter reviews
