To be honest, when I started to watch the movie, the image quality, sound effects, and costumes in the film were really uncomfortable. I had the urge to drop the video, but I could discover the fascinating aspects of this director if I watched it patiently.
Many short film reviews mentioned that they didn't understand the motive of the murder, and I was confused. Let me give a simple answer. You can discuss it together.
Let's talk about it in chronological order.
The story is very simple. It is that murderous mother and son who used to live in that Art Nouveau style house! (The castle where the protagonist entered) One night, my mother killed her husband hysterically, but didn't want outsiders to know, and then hid her husband in the dark house in the castle, sealing the windows and walls. Create a secret room, not let outsiders know.
At that time, my son was there to witness it, and when he was young, he attended the local Da Vinci school, but was unable to speak out due to the pressure from his mother, so he could only express himself on the wall of his room, as well as by drawing pictures during the school painting class. The crime of sight. That's why I found my son's childhood paintings in the student work files of Da Vinci School.
Later they moved. In a prophet’s speech, the prophet could see people’s past and future in his mind, and happened to select the son of the mother who was present. Through induction, the prophet sensed him. The crime committed by my mother in the past, and threatened to write it down and announce it to the public.
The son hurriedly told his mother to listen, and then the mother and son conspired to kill the prophet.
Then why did that writer die? ! Because the author who changed hands in the old castle was actually the author (said the old man in charge of the house), and the author knew about the previous homeowner, that is, the murder of the mother and son after he lived for some time. Later, I also moved after living for a while, and wrote and published novels based on this incident elsewhere, but most people think that she just made it up! So I don't think so, but once the protagonist asks the writer first, the mother and son will still be exposed, so the mother and son are killed.
There is also a plot describing his son as gay. (He lacked paternal love and gradually became gay since he was a child). This is very important, because in this way, the author was not killed in a piano practice, just a warning, and It's because he was knocked out in the old castle house and moved outside without being killed. It was because he said, "I love you" that he loves the protagonist. He likes to play the piano with him for two, and chatting and entertaining in the bar.
After knowing the outline and background of the story, the next adventure of the protagonist and the rest of the story are logical! I won't explain more here.
In the end, it is the people's door in the story at that time. It seems that the quality is not very good. You can break into the door casually, and then those people are killed~ Haha~
But overall the story is still intertwined. , Very interesting, the main culprit was the seemingly docile mother, which gave people a little more surprises. I really have to worship the master~ I have to show the deepest respect to the master.
Another thing I don’t understand is why the old man’s daughter in the old castle was slapped by the old man and called her a little witch, and the lizard in her hand fell to the ground. The little girl wanted to harm the protagonist? ? Or did the director deliberately create suspense? ? Personally, I think it is biased towards the second one, right? ?
View more about Deep Red reviews
