Hmm...Yes, when I saw this name in the opening movie, I was excited...It was arrogant and cute, and the accent of the ending sound...that's the characteristic of the young master~
I never thought about one day when I remembered something. I use the word ten years ago, but it is true that 1999 was indeed more than ten years ago, and I never thought that when someone talked about Anna and the king, the adjective used was "old film." It made me feel melancholy at the same time as the words used to describe pippo from "junior" to "veteran". Old movie...? But in my impression, only movies before the 1998 Titanic are called old movies...
My junior high school friend told me that her family had a VCD of Anna and the King, and asked me if I could not watch it. I can’t tell. …So I only watched this film until today.
What kind of a prosperous movie era was that, and now what kind of an era of sluggish original movies and original scripts. If this movie were placed back then, I would put it under the line at best, which is a middle level, but now I have been bombarded by vulgar movies for a few years, and then I go to see Anna and the King. It's amazing. Originally, I just wanted to see the young master, but I didn't expect Fa Ge to be so domineering. Even the theme song, How can I not love you, which was in the position of being skipped by me in the CD of a bunch of film and television songs, sounded at the end of the film, almost so amazing that I wanted to cry.
Without comparison, you don't know how rotten movies in this era have no lower limit.
I remember that a certain show once complained about a 1994 movie, because that year was a prosperous period for movies. Unfortunately, the film produced in 1994 was robbed of awards by too many good works. If it is released to this day, You can hardly imagine that it will feel like turning out. Poor when he was young, there were a bunch of movies that seemed to be classic today and thought they were shoddy.
Regardless of the script or the actors, except that the special effects are not as good as today, which one is not ten times better than today?
Originally I thought it was an indigenous king who was wearing gold, silver and gold, riding an elephant with bare feet, but Fa Ge played a domineering, principled, flexible, adherent to tradition, and open-minded. He was not only a brother, a father, or a king. His protagonist's aura is not letting go in front of Judy Foster, this is the charm of the actor. (Isn’t this supposed to be taken for granted? I sigh. Sure enough, too many bad movies have been watched in recent years!) I know that there is a saying that “the protagonist is for growth, the supporting role is for appreciation, and the villain is for promotion. "The story is developing"? What does this sentence mean? That is to say, when you turn the supporting role into the protagonist according to the mode of vulgar fiction, and magnify the selling point or even become the only shining point, it has no charm at all. Nowadays, the biggest problem with scripts is that they are overwhelmingly distracting. They don't know how to stop, leaving no room for aftertaste. The plot of dog blood can be there, but that can't be the whole movie. Why do I recommend BBC's HOLMOS? Because rot and cuteness are not its only selling points.
The king and Anna danced in the palace, and the ending sounded How can I not love you. It was a beautiful picture.
"Anna and the King" is definitely worth collecting and is definitely a classic movie.
How Can I Not Love You
View more about Anna and the King reviews
