The title expresses my impression.
On the first day at 19:00, 20-year-old fan, don’t pass it.
The new hope in 1977, dangling, relied on special effects and settings to win, but fortunately, the newborn calf was shocking and deaf.
In 1980, the master of the Empire Strikes Back was edited and edited with great craftsmanship. He stepped up a step and entered the palace of mainstream narrative images.
In the Return of the Jedi in 1983, the teddy bear fought against the high-tech empire, already relying on self-moving feelings to barely bring up the idea of a slippery slope.
The prequel trilogy from 1999 to 2005 was polarized. However, no matter how stinky and long everyone feels, and how offensive the scumbing is, at least Grandpa George Lucas can tell a story in every way. Put six chapters on the circle.
After Das Mickey's acquisition, the Dark Force took control of the new trilogy. It's really dog-tailed...
Awakened in 2015, pure re-enactment, no talented JJ, barely get through with his emotions
In 2017, the last Jedi old white fans have a lot of bad reviews. I think it's not bad. At least Rian Johnson is a bit new. It is a reaction to JJ's cheating.
In 2019, the untalented JJ struck again, finally revealing its mediocre standard with a complete 360-degree angle.
Of course, the director secretly broke the news through the youtube blogger and took the lead to buckle the pot on the head of female leader Catherine Kennedy, accusing her of too strong desire for control and requesting a re-editing.
But as far as the structure is concerned, the whole is a failure, regardless of whether it is a re-edited version.
How mediocre JJ is, you can see how the Force Awakens. The rise of Skywalker is the force awakening of twice the pride double the fall
One point is too much, I suggest you don't waste money.
Think of the new trilogy as a fan movie made by sand sculpture fans
View more about Star Wars: Episode IX - The Rise of Skywalker reviews
