The beginning of all controversy was Jiang Digui's "Tai Chi Flag Flying".
From "The Scarlet Letter" to Li Enzhu, and then from Li Enzhu to "Tai Chi Banner", anyway, a small circle. When men discover the world, they usually march forward with femininity, maybe their original purpose is for women. Discover the world? It's just an excuse for granted, anyway, I am like this.
This movie is good, as the following aspects can explain:
1. The screen is very clean, the scene of the war is more real, and there is no sb to pay the party dues before death.
2. The echoes from the beginning to the end and the placement of the baggage are obvious but not far-fetched.
3. The most outstanding thing is the respect for humanity. Time, space, political stance, everything is changing, only one thing remains the same, you will understand when you find it.
"We don't know anything about communism and democracy." "He is my brother. I just want him to go home." The protagonist can do anything to keep his loved ones away from the battlefield and death. You can kill people, you can kill friends, you can fight against the state apparatus, you can give up your lives, you can turn back and forth on the battlefield, and you can use the capitalist and communist positions as a bargaining chip for gambling. Family affection should be the electron closest to the nucleus of human nature, and it should be the most basic human instinct after personal survival desire is eliminated. Any system or practice that attempts to reverse and violate this instinct is inhuman.
Such a human tone predestined that the film could not be submitted for review in the mainland. The communist view of the country is: How can one betray the motherland for the sake of family affection? Where is your revolutionary consciousness? These two rhetorical questions have pushed basic kindness into the abyss.
A father would not let him send his children to the battlefield willingly. If I were a dad, I should do everything possible to get my son to escape when he is facing military service. Either I go to the top, or trust the relationship to top, or spend money to find someone else's son to top. You can come and call me not a human being, OK, it's okay, I'm father.
Fathers love their children, even if the children do something wrong, the father should not take the initiative to send the children to court. Uh? If you don't believe me, let me tell you that we have been like this for two thousand years until the October Revolution.
Any dynasty before the reform of laws and regulations in the late Qing Dynasty in China used "to get the first rebellion with one's own kiss" (see appendix) as the principle of transcending the law. In other words, if the son has committed a crime, it is only natural for Dad to protect him. In the face of a son who kills and overwhelms, the father who kills his relatives is a righteous father, and the father who lets his son run fast is also a good father. The law should be open to the public, and the law should respect human nature.
"If you don't join the army and fight, who will defend your home and the country?"-Sven's mother,
my kind mother.
I did not say that we should not perform military service, but that when we assume responsibility to the country and the nation, we should first recognize that human nature is selfish, and that selfish human nature makes individuals want to escape state responsibility; secondly, we should allow the kind of obligatory The pain revealed when taking responsibility for the country and giving up family affection.
Sending a child to the battlefield should be forced, tears of the old, wrapped in a hundred feet of plain silk; instead of riding a tall horse with huge red flowers, beating gongs and drums with joy. Your son is going to die, what can you be happy about? For the motherland, for the people, does he have to be happy when his son is dead? If you are happy, are you still a dad? The motherland and the people are both abstract concepts, and the son is the living creature you have raised since childhood. Are you really stupid?
In a word, let doctrine die and let people live.
Attachment: The first concealment of the relatives is one of the principles of the penal application in the Han Dynasty. It specifically refers to the three generations of direct blood relatives and between husbands and wives as stipulated by the law of the Han Dynasty. In addition to committing crimes other than treason and rebellion, the guilty should cover and conceal each other. Report to the government; the law does not pursue criminal responsibility for acts of concealment of crimes between relatives. This principle of concealing crimes between relatives without criminal responsibility originates from the Confucius preached "Father is hidden for the son, and the son is hidden for the father, and he stays straight in it" (The Analects of Confucius • Zilu)
In the four years of Emperor Xuan's Divine Festival of the Han Dynasty (66 years ago), the edict clearly stipulated: "The relationship between father and son, the way of husband and wife, and the nature. Although there is trouble, it will survive death. Sincere love is bound to the heart, and kindness is the ultimate. , How can it be violated! Since the first child hides his parents, his wife hides his husband, and his grandparents do not sit. Their parents hide their children, their husbands hide their wives, their eldest parents hide their grandchildren, and they all have sinned to death. "("Han Shu" Volume 8 "Xuan Di Ji") According to this, the humble child concealed the guilty elder and did not pursue criminal responsibility; the elder concealed the guilty humble child, the captain of the capital crime asked the court lieutenant to decide whether to pursue the guilt or not, and no criminal responsibility below the capital crime. responsibility. This criminal law application system has become one of the important criminal law principles in ancient China since Emperor Xuan of the Han Dynasty, and it has been used for generations to come.
View more about Tae Guk Gi: The Brotherhood of War reviews
