The problem with this film is that it is not "cinematic". Movies always talk about what the characters do, not through what the characters say, and express us an author’s point of view. The reason for this is that no matter what culture or country, language is cheap and does not take much weight. Because too much water was injected.
Keith is something filled with water. He can only express himself through what he said and what he said to others. Moreover, the expression chosen by the screenwriter and the director is unconvincing.
I have always been interested in the stories of middle school students, but I don't understand the character Keith, I can't feel him-I think he is a lie in my heart.
And what this film can save itself is that it sincerely shows the psychological world of the heroine-I can feel her situation and psychology every moment, this is the success of the screenwriter and director.
But for me, this kind of elitist individual penetrates the scorching state of the world, and the story of the great mystery of life is not more than one, and one less. Oscars are the story of Disillusion year after year. If you want the audience to feel that the meaning of life is obliterated, you must not find someone who has only experienced 17 years of life as a teaching material. This is too self-righteous.
When your movie has no novelty that is particularly noticeable, unless your star and production team are strong, people in the industry will definitely be suspected of plagiarism-often wronged. But when others watch it, they will definitely cite a series of popular videos from previous years and say that this is the prototype they found from there.
So if the reader intends to make this kind of movie at his own expense-I will definitely not support you. Because I think that including "Revolutionary Road", you should stay honestly on the books or in the theater. Because in the darkness of a movie theater, language has no image to be trusted.
View more about Keith reviews
