Finally, I knew what really had happened to the flight via that 10 minutes' ending by myself. But a further question comes out:
Why I was misled by Claire? How people analyze the information presented to them and how they judge these information?
Yes, Clare looks young, charming and, most important, professional. As an PHD student in this field,she was assumed to be fine and right. And the airline staff's claim seemed everything but to be trust. Actually, all the above presentations are just the trick settled by the writer and director and I am totally deceived. Only the last 10 minutes which can let me out of that belief in Claire.
An enlightened person should think critically especially for this kind of enter a situation with single doubt-simply doubt on "the most likely bad one". The intuition is useful sometimes. But this is not enough. How to get rid of that intuition or illusion. One of American criminal law principle may be appliable here:
Proof beyond reasonable doubt
(which means "the proposition being presented by the government must be proven to the extent that there is no reasonable doubt in the mind of a reasonable person that the defendant is guilty.")
= =!
View more about Passengers reviews
