remember an evaluation of Silver Wing’s first film that I saw somewhere, called a French film in a sci-fi movie. The sequel tastes quite right on this point: a kind of thick, following the early metropolis. The film noir style type of classic science fiction films. However, the sharp aesthetic preference in the original work is still weakened in the sequel. 2049 is more gentle in character creation and plot structure, and of course more stylized, especially the stereotypes of female characters and the ubiquitous service shots. It's especially criticized-but most of the private feedback from my friends is very positive. Both men and women give positive comments on Joi and my dear Miss Jaws Luv. As for the "out of control" and ambiguity talked about in some original works, they were also carefully and cleverly avoided by the director, so the viewing experience is relatively more tolerant. In the end, this is what it shows. It is within the technical guarantee of commercial blockbusters, but it is still hopelessly carrying a certain literary core. The ghost knows whether you will like the movie.
Dolby Cinema, 3D, ordinary hall and two different IMAX halls are all brushed down. In fact, I personally feel that the most critical part of this film is the sound. The low frequency of the soundtrack and sound effects are very interesting. I still have to go to Dolby Cinema if I have the opportunity. The sound effects and the resonance of the seat back feel like I am sitting in the car; then about the recent 3D that is generally unpopular in domestic screenings, although the photographer It was revealed on social media that the film was actually shot in 2D, but obviously there are quite a lot of lenses, especially those special effects shots flying in the rain. It is still very worthwhile to experience 3D. I am in IMAX and 3D halls. I feel the illusion that the whole hall is rotating with the car... As for the IMAX big screen, I first like the countdown design at the beginning, which is very cool and matches the style of the feature film. And IMAX can really help to notice a lot of details.
There are a lot of tributes to the past and to the old times in the movie. Compare it with another recently hit Golden Circle. Both have some tribute shots to the old times. Wang Nan probably can’t be called. Tribute...the pursuit of curiosity and bad taste is temporary, and only nostalgia (Nostalgia) is permanent. It is still familiar with the composure and sentimentality of the 1980s, especially for some long shots and light and shadow scheduling, which can feel a strong literary quality, which is more and more rare to tell the truth, and is willing to wait for the audience to brew their emotions. patience. In fact, the picture contains a lot of information. However, there are probably too many big movies that highlight all the information related to the plot, and then explode in front of you and push you to run wildly, and cultivate people's movie-watching habits. I
’m a little lazy... I saw a lot of film reviews saying that it’s too slow, and the sequel is very much the same as the original. If you should fall asleep, watch it 30 times and you will fall asleep. In that emotion, as long as you stretch out your hand, you can be drenched by the rain from Los Angeles that hasn't stopped for 30 years... I really like the eyes of the K on the bridge and the giant Joi in the rain screen, better than it seems Everyone likes and discusses the intertextual significance of those snow scenes; this film has a very literary core like the original film, which is felt at that moment, the protagonist is no longer burdened with self-evidence. The protagonist is just a fragile personal perspective against the background of this magnificent philosophy and science fiction.
I probably don’t seem to have spoilers?
View more about Blade Runner 2049 reviews
