This film and the movie version are a little bit disappointed than true. The protagonist feels that the setting is not good, and now I don’t know if they are all politically correct, and the protagonist has a black role. And it's a good doomsday theme, and it just happens to be suspenseful to solve the case, and so on. There are also a lot of bugs. But read all the brief comments. I found that those who rated low scores were just squirming. I didn't even watch the first episode, or didn't watch it carefully. Some didn't even look at it for the first minute. Just give me 1 star and 2 stars.
1. Some complaints have security, but how come the old people and children at the back of this car squeeze into it. The old man may be struggling. But every time you watch an episode, you should know that most children are born in cars. Swipe roughly, and only one and a half of them were squeezed up before, right?
2. Another remark is as follows: I made money to buy a villa, a homeless man took advantage of my carelessness to set up a tent in my backyard, I think he is poor, did not drive him away, every day he gave him leftovers. . One day a homeless man said to me, I am poor and I was exploited by you rich people. You give me a bedroom and share half of your things with me, otherwise I will violently snatch it. What do you say I should do?
This remark is boastful, it seems rigorous, and the logic is closed. It makes sense to look at it. But don’t you even watch the first minute? This is not a planet hitting the earth, nor a big tsunami, nor any natural end of the world of Barabara. That sentence is so obvious that many people who caused this disaster hid in this car. This is the artificial end of the world. If you use that example, you should also add a major premise. You bombed everyone's homes and killed most of your other family and friends. Then you bought a villa yourself. People stayed in your backyard while you were not paying attention. Is this the correct metaphor? In reality, if I blow up your house and kill most of your relatives and friends, you won't be able to live anymore. Wouldn't you find me desperately? Would you just ask me to give you half of the family property, would you be happy? Do you think that the people at the rear of the car just want to live and enjoy the third-class treatment is too much?
3. Some people are quite rigorous. They also checked how long the train is and how long it takes for the 1001 female boss to go back and forth. Didn’t you see a cable car-like transmission system in the car in the first episode?
4. There is another talk about setting, and the remarks are as follows: At the end of the world, is there a more stupid way of survival than driving a train around the world? Not to mention the high cost of construction in the early stage, operation and maintenance is an engineer’s nightmare. Any single point failure on the train or track is catastrophic. The car itself can barely be maintained. I don’t even think about who is maintaining the track. . The existence of the train structure is a trade-off in order to reduce transportation costs. It is idiotic to use it as a living space. The average moving cost between two points is linearly related to the total amount of space, and the channel also takes up space. What's the equivalent? Use the linked list to implement the lookup table, and then set aside one-third of the space for each node to store the addresses of the front and back nodes. Where is the space-time efficiency low?
This remark is speechless enough. The biggest bug in this play is obviously perpetual motion machine. Perpetual motion machines violate the most basic energy rules. However, this soft sci-fi setting, which cannot be softer, is that the perpetual motion machine set exists. If you get disgusting by this setting, you don't need to watch it at all, just 1 star. Then look at the first point of this movie, that is, you have to accept this setting. This assumes that the greater the perpetual mobility, the greater the work that can be output. And now that I accepted this setting and watched one episode, most of the complaints are no-brainer. It is necessary to design a super large machine that can continuously move and generate a lot of energy, which can not only resist the low temperature consumption below minus 100 degrees outside, but also have enough internal energy supply. Is there a problem with the design as a train? Even if it is designed as a train, the speed must be maintained at a high speed to be able to supply enough energy in the car. The speed drops by 12%, and the electricity needs to be cut off in the car. How do you do it in other ways? And do the rails need to be maintained all the time? The design is made of low-temperature resistant materials, and when put into use, the external temperature is almost constant throughout the year, and there will be no modern temperature changes that affect the life of the rails, resulting in thermal expansion and contraction, corrosion durability, and so on. Only used once a year, about 1 minute at a time. It broke in 6 minutes? Like this is not the background of the modern era, in the technological age when permanent human body freezing has been realized, the railroad tracks are so easy to break? What's more efficient and what's going on afterwards, it's even more thoughtless. In this environment, what efficiency do you need to make you wear hundreds of carriages every day or how? Except for Boss, others don't need to do this kind of thing at all. Instead, the smaller the moving area, the better. The linear segmentation of trains is a very convenient way to design a grading system. The tail person cannot skip the third-class area to reach the second-class area. Third-class citizens cannot skip the second-class area to reach the first-class area. What use are you talking about in this doomsday? Isn't the low mobile efficiency just in line with the concept of design? It is highly efficient to be able to reach any area in ten minutes. Didn’t the tail people go straight to Huanglong?
5. There are really countless other kinds of remarks. Most of them are things that were explained and understood, but they were used to complain. Why is there a spray car to move? Doesn't it save a lot of energy to stop there? This clearly shows that it is a perpetual motion machine and requires exercise to do work. At the beginning of the second episode, the technician and Boss said that I recommended a 12% reduction in speed. The Boss retorted that I cannot declare a power outage. Obviously it is an explanation that the perpetual motion machine must move to output work.
I was a little disappointed with this film and wanted to make a low score, but I saw what kind of evaluation the low scores are. I really don't dare to associate with the low-scoring crowd.
View more about Snowpiercer reviews
